freepers advocate everyone voting edwards

[leftofthedial]

to make polls look obviously bogus


right now, major polls are tracking anywhere from 80 - 20 to 90 - 10 in favor of Edwards.

Does that mean that without freepers, the 'pukes can only muster about 15% of the vote?

[LittleClarkie]

1. I'm afraid of that

The polls are ridiculous right now. Unless people really did react that badly to Cheney's Dr. Evil impersonation.

[michigandem2]

2. let them....they put them up there for a reason...

BUT Cheney LIED....he blatantly lied so the 65% of the repukes STILL believe Saddam had a connection to 9/11 now he just came out and said "i never said that" HE LIED!

[Jade Fox]

3. That strategy seems too obtuse to work....

I think they will find they have a gun-shot wound in their foot.

[Catch22Dem]

7. I could help them aim higher...

Make them join the Air Force, that is. ;)

[MsMagnificent]

15. Nah, they'll just join the Air National Guard

and not show up!

[iwantmycountryback]

4. Whatever this debate doesn't matter

They must have pretty pathetic lives to go around sabotaging polls. Shouldn't they be busy making sure the government isn't too big or somethin?

[leftofthedial]

5. PLEEEEEEEZE let a few million Americans realize that cheney is a lying

coprolite


it was so obvious and blatant.

[HootieMcBoob]

6. That's their plan for the actual election too

They're going to advocate that everyone vote for Kerry instead of Bush so that when Kerry wins in a landslide they can say that the this whole election thing is bogus :dunce::wtf:

[Guaranteed]

8. Good! LET THEM!!

That's just going to tell the media that they're out of touch with the American people.

Freepers are IDIOTS!!

[crispini]

9. Agree, both points are true.

Remember, unlike us, Freepers use scripts, etc to hit polls multiple times ... some people say....

And, without their busy online efforts, the ordinary repubs, who only got the official memo, are only voting once, and maybe in 2 or 3 polls.

[ParanoidPat]

14. some people say???

You should see all the posts about, "how to dump your cookies and reset your modem so you can vote multiple times", that they post there!

Problem is that they actually believe the results of the polls that they know they 'freeped'! :crazy: :evilgrin:

[bush equals idiot]

20. They have to even copy our media list to know where the polls are.

They're as bright as the light inside your refrigerator with the door closed.

[Fozzledick]

10. Just sour grapes

I think they're just demoralized by how poorly their guys did!

[sonicx]

11. didn't the RNC chairman tell people to freep polls for cheney?

opps!! :D

[merh]

12. Sounds to me like the freepers are just trying to cushion the

blows to their egos and hedge their bets (look what we did we made the polls change). In fact what they will succeed in doing is shooting themselves in both feet. imho

[incapsulated]

13. Good

They're fools. Plus, there aren't enough of them to make the polls this lopsided. Edwards won, period.

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

16. This is ridiculous on its face. Could you bring yourself to vote shrub

or cheney in any poll, online or otherwise?

[Vincardog]

17. They are still lying When the polls go against them the polls don't count

When GW is ahead by 1% it is a decisive lead.

[grace0418]

19. Not at all

In fact, last Thursday when I was doing all those polls after the pres. debate, there was one poll that had a confusing graphic and I accidently selected Dumbya as the winner. I was so horrified with myself! After that I slowed down and triple-checked to make sure I'd made the right selection.

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

22. Right, but I meant on purpose.

[alphafemale]

30. never n/t

[cheezus]

18. if only they get this strageregy going for Nov 2...

[grace0418]

21. ha ha!

Yes Freepers, vote Kerry/Edwards on Nov. 2! That'll really stick it to us!

[AntiCoup2K4]

23. Actually, maybe they should.....

Imagine if all the Freeps voted for Kerry, and Diebold STILL said Bush "won".

Then the Freeps would know it was rigged. But would they admit it?

[Bongo Prophet]

24. Their numbers are exaggerated, as is their self-importance

When Iraq fiasco was at it's hottest point of buildup, protests against were in the 100,000s and c-span showed one of their pro-war rallies with less than a dozen freepers standing around. Big sound system though.

[ogradda]

25. they did?

and joe blow on the street is gonna know these polls are freeped? and say o! that polls been freeped? and this is supposed to accomplish what? i will never understand their thinking.

[leftofthedial]

26. the idea was that the polls would be so out of whack

that the media pundits would discount them entirely

personally, I think they knew their guy lost and want to try to discredit the polls that make cheney's loss obvious.

[ogradda]

28. that is one of the most convoluted things

i have ever heard of.

[AgadorSparticus]

27. only freepers could come up with something that stupid. LOL

not that I'm complaining! :)

[Awsi Dooger]

29. Ha, this is like my friends and I in las Vegas

Intentionally wagering the wrong way when we think it's a potential benefit. The Stardust puts up the first betting numbers but has some ridiculously low limits, like $300 on basketball totals. When they put up a 147 over/under on a college basketball NCAA tournament game, for example, we might bet it up to 153 then wait for the major casinos and offshore betting groups to mimmick the Stardust number. Then we pounce on the under, the side we wanted all along but now much larger amounts and a far better number.

Admittedly, this worked quite a bit better a few years ago. They know our gag now.

[colonel odis]

31. as we say down south, bless their hearts.

they just want to take credit for being part of at least one thing that's successful.