Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich reclaimed the word "protectionist" in Iowa tonight.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:15 PM
Original message
Kucinich reclaimed the word "protectionist" in Iowa tonight.
Approximate transcript of Kucinich:

My first act as President will be to cancel NAFTA and the WTO.

When I tell people this, they respond, "Oh, you're a protectionist."

Damn straight I'm a protectionist!

I want to protect American manufacturing jobs and I want to protect American high-tech jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did you hear him live
or online?

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. this was broadcast live on C-Span an hour ago (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. C-SPAN will rebroadcast...
...the Linn County Democrats dinner a few minutes from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would to see him say that in a nationally televised debate
He would be certain to pick up a lot more support......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's the man!
These policies will attract a big number of Republican voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't he great?!!! He said pretty much the same thing in D.C.

on Friday, where only he and CMB and Sharpton showed up for the debate.

We do have to do something if we don't want to all be working for minimum wage. NAFTA and WTO may have helped others but they've hurt us -- if we stay in them, we're stupid. It's great to help others but Americans need jobs, too.

Another one of the big problems is today's high executive salaries. That's taking money away from workers. Corporations could pay their workers better and still give their executives large salaries -- it's the $30 million a year salaries that are ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Don't be so mean
:P
"if we stay in them, we're stupid"


shhh don't say that. A heck of a lot of DUers support candidates tjat will stick with NAFTA. Don't you know its hip to shift your Democratic ideals to the right so that you can be a winner!

:)

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dennis totally rocked in that speech!
( :hi: Thanks for the heads up Zomby!!)

He was on fire!!!
and the standing O's he got...it all really gave me hope.

I don't know how anyone can listen to this man and not be moved!

Dennis :yourock:

hoooo baby!!


Peace & hope
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. Great speech...
He was firey and addressed alot of important issues, it was impressive. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Awesome.
NAFTA needs to go!

It is unDemocratic to support NAFTA.

"I want to protect American manufacturing jobs and I want to protect American high-tech jobs."

Rock on Dennis!


TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. "It is unDemocratic to support NAFTA"
Wow well put. When you consider the loss of sovreignity involved in some of the articles / chapters of NAFTA, that's a very accurate statement.

That was an awesome moment.

It was interesting to watch the crowd during his speech. While he was excoriating our policy in Iraq, it was interesting how many supported DK's UN in US out plan, and by contrast watching how many sat silent and stone-faced. :) Quite telling, it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. He is not a protectionist in the negative sense.
Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 03:48 AM by cyclezealot
DK will re-establish trade as soon as it is fair..Sounds good to me. What is wrong with protecting America's manufacturing base.. About time...American trade deficits will eventually sink us and the whoe world, after some future date the dollar sinks from $.75 to what did John Snow say..Possibly $.45 per euro... Such a weak dollar and we think we will survive economically.
DK the protector, Bush the traitor..Selling out our contry for the profits of the likes of Nike, Mattel, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Question
When you talk about "fair" trade, who gets to define what is fair? The US or its trading partners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Both
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 11:41 AM by Lydia Leftcoast
Trade that doesn't destroy American jobs.

Trade that doesn't amount to exploitation of desperate, starving people whose countries have repressive governments and no environmental or safety laws

Policies that encourage indigenous entrepreneurs instead of situations like you see in Central America and the Caribbean, where Taiwanese clothing manufacturers run sweatshops to make clothes to sell to American discount stores, who then sell it to American consumers at a huge mark-up.
Policies that encourage countries of relatively equal economic status within a region to cooperate in developing their own industrial bases and areas of strength

The current "free trade" situation is fantastic for those whose income stems largely from investments, but dangerous and demoralizing for the rest of us. It's the triumph of the Great God Money over all human considerations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Both, what makes it 'fair' is
that enormous, powerful multinationals have no say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. DK
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. DK!
Da Kick!

Another reason to vote for Dennis.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sad
The same trade policies that helped plunge this country into the Great Depression are advocated by DK and people here cheer.

Unbelieveable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. So you think trade policy was a key instigator for the Great Depression?
Interesting.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibInternationalist Donating Member (861 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. you bet your ass it was
protectionism is BAD for more people than it is good for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Got a source for that doozie?
You will probably find it was fiscal policies (allowing brokerage houses to also do analyst work, for example) more than any trade policy that was a precipitator for the depression.

But please, do share any reference to any trade policy, any trade policy you choose, which you believe was key in causing the depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. no nation ever self developed
with cheap labor

high wage labor is what built this land

and ALL nations that have self developed have done so with high paid labor

NAFTA is the enemy of high paid labor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yeah, right
And we didn't get out of the Great Depression til Clinton and the right-wingers pushed through NAFTA and the WTO, right?

Sure, pal, sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. What, BiLateral trade lead to the depression?
I wasn't aware of that. I thought it was the crash of 1929...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. most countries in Europe are more protectionist than the USA
and surveys show that the highest quality of life for working people is found in Europe.

QED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Every country that has actually achieved economic growth
to affluence has done so through protectionist policies and heavy investment in infrastructure, not in opening their borders to seekers of cheap labor and currency speculators.

The World Bank and the IMF require Third World countries to build up their export markets instead of their domestic markets as a condition for receiving loans. In the case of African countries, it means exporting unprocessed coffee, cocoa, minerals, and so on. This is why the Third World countries are "demanding free trade." Their IMF and World Bank loans depend on it.

It would be much better for those economies in the long run if they could instead build domestic and regional markets for processed versions of their natural resources.

A friend of my parents was a missionary in Liberia in the 1950s and 1960s. When he was back on furlough, he used to shake his head over foreign aid policies. In one case, the U.S. government funded the building of a state-of-the-art road from one town to another, using fancy construction equipment. This man's point was that very few Liberians had cars, so you could get by with simpler roads. Furthermore, there were thousands of unemployed young men who would jump at the chance to earn the then-prevailing wage of 10 cents an hour to help build gravel roads. The wages of these thousands of men would then fuel the local economy as they bought things they had previously been unable to afford.

I guess that made too much sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. not true
and there was very little "trade" at that time anyways

poor agriculture policies, poor lending practices, and conservative policies of the previous administration left the problem...it led to a market crash...Roosevelt put in place protectionist policies and they WORKED

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Interesting
The "Conventional Wisdom" that opposing NAFTA or the WTO = isolationism has now been trumped by the Kooch. He's spoken clearly about protecting our economy, and now that that's complete, we're onto the next canard -- protecting US jobs = depression.

Oh the humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. i agree
i believe it isn't "isolationism" if put in place by Dennis, because he is speaking to a larger issue

now if Pat Buchanan were to repeal NAFTA, it would be for a different reason...THAT would be isolationism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. The tariffs of the pre-Depression era
really were intended to shut down trade, not make it more fair.

Int'l trade would continue under a Kucinich administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. that point is seldom recognized with the media distortions
So many uninformed people believe that DK wants to stop trade. They hear too much of the soundbite media. Gee, he only wants to continue trade while protecting worker's, citizens and the environment. What a nutty idea!

TWL :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Did DK use "Damn straight I'm a protectionist" in the debate yesterday?
He should use it whenever and wherever he can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. nice and blunt
:) It would be a good beginner, then he could calmly state that he means to protect american jobs. People would listen.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. ZombyDKick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC