Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just like in Chess, Cheney with the white pieces had a HUGE advantage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nine30 Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:09 AM
Original message
Just like in Chess, Cheney with the white pieces had a HUGE advantage
Thats true folks. Cheney got the first move and that biased the whole debate in Cheney's favor, this is not to say Cheney won. He didn't but thats another issue.

In the first 2 min Cheney took jabs at Kerry and Edwards had to spend precious seconds out of his only 90 sec reply being forced to defend himself. And then Cheney would attack again...

All Cheney did for most of the debate was sit next to Edwards grinding his teeth and snarling as if to say "How did they let this piece of sh*t even SIT next to me". He uttered the same lies (Iraq was the right thing to do..)to which I think Edwards should have been more dramatic with the counter attack. Edwards should have said something like "Mr Vice P. are you honestly telling us all even after all we know now that Iraq was the right thing to do ? <pause for effect>

Though in substance Edwards was the clear winner I just don't think he was agressive enough. He smiled too much which took the sharpness out of his attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's not how I saw it
Cheney would land a blow...you'd think, "Oh, shit, that was bad." and then Edwards would come back and just jab the hell out of him. Every time. With a smile. That's how he won his cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. It pissed me off when Edwards wanted a 30 sec. reply
near the beginning and she wouldn't let him have it.

And then later she keeps asking Cheney if he wants a 30 response. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Edwards won a huge victory through demeanor alone
You point it out yourself.

Cheney: grinding his teeth and snarling and lying

Edwards: defending his record with a smile and poking holes in Cheney's credibility

You'll notice, too, that Edwards stumped Cheney outright on some issues -- gay marriage, for example, Cheney barely said anything in rebuttal. Edwards probably could have been more agressive, but I think he chose not to do so. In two or three days, most of the specifics are going to fade away from the public eye. After all, it's only a VP debate, right? What people are left with, then, are their overall impressions and a few key moments.

Debates like this have to be aligned for long-term memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Funny, I saw it just the opposite
On so many questions I was relieved Edwards had the benefit of the rotation, the last word. Particularly on Halliburton, where Cheney basically fumbled his 30 second reply with "can't cover everything in 30 seconds" then Edwards nailed him with a rerun of "these are the facts." I sensed Cheney was pissed off at that point and never recovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC