Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who else thought that the question about telling about yourself

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:31 AM
Original message
Who else thought that the question about telling about yourself
without mentioning the presidential candidate's name was entirely INANE?

Still, Edwards should have done better...

Also, why the hell did Edwards question the moderator at the end when he thought that it wasn't his turn? Take the time and screw the rules, John! It was housekeeping mundaneness while you had millions of people that you needed to communicate with.

Does anyone really think that Cheney would have hestitated in grabbing extra time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Totally inane...
...especially condidering the fact that a pronoun could be used instead and accomplish the exact same thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not just inane, but moronic
Ifill's moderating was poorly done, in my opinion, and really distracted from the last half of the debate.

--Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Moronic redux
Sometime during the debate Cheney says "Gwen..." and Ifill says " Mr. Vice President..."

One point I loved, though. Cheney said something about a question and Ifill says "That's the question, Mr. Vice President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are you kidding? That was the best thing of the night!
Edwards scored a TON of points by being mindful of the rules, laughing about using Kerry's name.. and being charming. It worked to his benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I just thought that it showed him to be kinda ditzy.
He didn't seem to be doing it on purpose--- like with a charming, roguish impudence. He just seemed to be unable to focus on the question and the "rule."

I hope that it struck a lot of people like it did you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No. It just reinforced how stupid that "rule" was.
This isn't a high-school homework assignment. We are electing a President here. No one cares about stupid, contrived rules about whether you are allowed to mention our next President's name or not.

--Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I wondered about that too...
it was like a trick played on Edwards (which he handled beautifully so no harm done).

Edwards used John Kerry's name many many times throughout the debate I believe to saturate the point that Kerry and Edwards work as a team... Notice that Cheney didn't make much reference to His partner at all - as this would be more an embarrassment than a positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Some talking heads picked up on Cheney's much "non-re f"
to Bush. They riffed on whether his better appearance actually showed up Bush.

I have to disagree to an extent. Cheney gave Bush a strong thumbs up several times but clearly he didn't need anybody's help in defending the administration and himself. I mean, afterall, Cheney is the chief architect of the Iraq policy. He should be able to defend it well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC