Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tweety has John Fund against non-biased Wa. Post reporter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:36 PM
Original message
Tweety has John Fund against non-biased Wa. Post reporter
this is bullshit... Typical Tweety, bowing to right wing pressure puts John Fund up against a non-partisan reporter (Mark Leibovich)... Doesn't explicitly ID the WP guy as non-partisan and Fund as partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. yup
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. OMG
The reporter says that Edwards isn't very light on his feet in debate.

Uh.....a trial lawyer not light on his feet??

Gawd, the whole thing is ludicrous. Now they're blaming Edwards for not remembering sitting by Cheney at the prayer breakfast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. non-biased? He's trashing Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. no biased in the sense
he called it a draw. A lot of it depends on Tweety's questions.. He could point out Cheney not looking at the moderator, mumbling, covering his mouth, distorting issues, etc., but if Tweety only attacks Edwards, the Post's guy in effect sounds biased against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioan Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So, we've got Fund and Matthews dogging out Edwards
but we have a "non-biased" reporter on to dog out BOTH Cheney and Edwards.

Not very balanced, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. yeah, hardly balanced
and Matthews recognizing that he preferred Cheney in the debate should have made an extra effort to either not have Fund or put someone in with a liberal bias... That guy on MSNBC's own payroll they never use - Eric Alterman, would be good. But he's basically blackballed from their own network for doing what Fund does on routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Puke alert!
Thanks for warning us! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fund is close to the top of my pukey repuke list. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's a gang trashing of Edwards and love fest for Cheney
Unbelievable. "What a gravitas... what a zinger...what poise...took him to the woodshed..." "Well maybe what he was saying wasn't exactly true but what gravitas...what poise...what depth!!!"

Excuse me while I throw up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Will wahtever Dem he has on next call him on it on air? No? Go tweety!!
if the Dems won't stand up to the whores on air in real time, how the fuck do they expect me to? If a dem doesn't call tweety on this, I say more whorepower to the Tweetster!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fund was unopposed for the 2nd segment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC