TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:36 PM
Original message |
Tweety has John Fund against non-biased Wa. Post reporter |
|
this is bullshit... Typical Tweety, bowing to right wing pressure puts John Fund up against a non-partisan reporter (Mark Leibovich)... Doesn't explicitly ID the WP guy as non-partisan and Fund as partisan.
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The reporter says that Edwards isn't very light on his feet in debate.
Uh.....a trial lawyer not light on his feet??
Gawd, the whole thing is ludicrous. Now they're blaming Edwards for not remembering sitting by Cheney at the prayer breakfast!
|
mbali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. non-biased? He's trashing Edwards! |
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. no biased in the sense |
|
he called it a draw. A lot of it depends on Tweety's questions.. He could point out Cheney not looking at the moderator, mumbling, covering his mouth, distorting issues, etc., but if Tweety only attacks Edwards, the Post's guy in effect sounds biased against him.
|
ohioan
(563 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. So, we've got Fund and Matthews dogging out Edwards |
|
but we have a "non-biased" reporter on to dog out BOTH Cheney and Edwards.
Not very balanced, is it?
|
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. yeah, hardly balanced |
|
and Matthews recognizing that he preferred Cheney in the debate should have made an extra effort to either not have Fund or put someone in with a liberal bias... That guy on MSNBC's own payroll they never use - Eric Alterman, would be good. But he's basically blackballed from their own network for doing what Fund does on routine.
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Thanks for warning us! :yourock:
|
dogtag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Fund is close to the top of my pukey repuke list. (n/t) |
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It's a gang trashing of Edwards and love fest for Cheney |
|
Unbelievable. "What a gravitas... what a zinger...what poise...took him to the woodshed..." "Well maybe what he was saying wasn't exactly true but what gravitas...what poise...what depth!!!"
Excuse me while I throw up
|
John_H
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Will wahtever Dem he has on next call him on it on air? No? Go tweety!! |
|
if the Dems won't stand up to the whores on air in real time, how the fuck do they expect me to? If a dem doesn't call tweety on this, I say more whorepower to the Tweetster!!
|
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Fund was unopposed for the 2nd segment |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |