ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:08 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Is Alan Keyes running the worst campaign in history? |
|
I can't think of a worse one.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message |
1. how we can tie alan keyes in with bush and the gang to show.... |
|
that this is how the republicans really are, but they have to find a black man to show the true face because the white people will not believe a white republican could be this.............evil...even though keyes is merely spouting the republican PLATFORM????
Msongs Riverside CA
|
GimmeDANEger
(505 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
he could lose to a dead man.
|
WindRavenX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
That's when you know you suck- when a freakin' CORPSE wins the election over you!
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I can't really think of anything worse.
|
Dehumanizer
(174 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Because I've only had the privilege of hearing random bits about his campaign here and there, can anyone give a complete summary rundown on all of Keyes' mistakes..?
|
ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
-claimed that God would decide of the election -compared Obama's position to abortion to a slaveholder -said we should do away with election of senators -said 9/11 was punishment for abortion -referred to gays as "heathens" -claimed that Jesus would vote against Obama -and just yesterday came out in favor of mandatory military service
any more?
|
AgadorSparticus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. LOL. it's hard to believe that Keyes is legally competent, isn't it? |
|
I am still in disbelief that the repukes resorted to him.
|
ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
they could've found some Republican janitor in Peoria, put his name on the ballot, not ran any campaign at all, and still probably got around 35% at least.
Instead they dig up a guy who runs BELOW the party base. Now that's not strong on logic!
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
7. not really since his goal is not to win |
|
since he knows he can't win
|
ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
to get in the single digits! For a major party candidate to get single digits would be quite a feat! or maybe he's trying to finish behind the Libertarian and be able to brag that not only has he lost Senate races in TWO states, but that he came in third place in one!
|
cheshire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message |
10. No that f**king SOB in the WH is, sorry I hate him, he is also a bigger |
Bleacher Creature
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
12. It's a pretty bold statement |
|
But it makes you wonder when a previously unknown candidate running for an open Senate seat is so far ahead that he can start campaigning in other states (Obama was in PA last week).
Nevertheless, still got to give to to Asscroft in 2000.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message |