Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Brokaw's defense of the Smear Vet coverage was idiotic.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:18 PM
Original message
Tom Brokaw's defense of the Smear Vet coverage was idiotic.
I heard him on the radio today. It was a rebroadcast of the New Yorker magazine conference over the weekend. I understand CSPAN covered this event.

After Rather and Jennings admitted the media gave outright fabrications too much coverage, Brokaw chimed in. He said (1) one of the Smear Vets walked down the street with him at the RNC waving pages of papers at him supporting their claims, and (2) "What about the lies in F 911 -- that got a lot of coverage too."

OK, so about #1, I have questions and comments: Why does a Smear Vet have such incredible access to Brokaw? I wish I could walk down the street with Brokaw and tell him what I thought about the media and about current events. Also, doesn't Brokaw appreciate the allusion to McCarthyism he just described? Also, why does he feel the need to suggest that they weren't lying and that they honestly believe the smears? Thanks, Tom, for rehabilitating their credibility after Jennings and Rather just said they had none.

About #2, WHAT LIES IN F911? Furthermore, what the hell does Brokaw thing the role of the media is today? To offer RW balance to whatever there might be out there that is left wing? Does he think his job is to spread lies or be half-assed about reporting facts just because there might be some bit of info out there that he doesn't like?

What an outrageous asshole. I'm ashamed for the New Yorker readers in the audience who applauded these two points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. See how that works..facts in F9/11 with pages of proof, are lies...
..Lies from SwiftBoat liars with pages of 'proof' are true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Brokaw Ran Into Them At The RNC
Remember, Ben Ginsburg, the Slimeboat lawyer is now a paid "anal-ist" for MSGOP.

He was covering the convention while most of this shit was swirling and had a solid week of nonstop elbow rubbing with the right wing assholes.

I saw the C-SPAN showing and strongly recommend all to watch it. Rather was excellent and stood firm on his story and how he was slimed.

Remember, Brokaw operates out of New York...not inside the Beltway and doesn't have the contacts with the party hacks on a regular basis...that's Timmy Russert's job (and he does is soo very well). I could understand Brokaw getting inundated with this crap during the RNC and at the time just wondering WTF.

It sounded like he regretted both the amount of coverage these asshoels got and the hosing Rather has and is still taking. But, above all, he looks like a guy on the way out...not wanting to make any waves...take the gold watch and head off to into the Cronkite sunset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't forget - he really believes the WWII generation was
the greatest generation. You know, the group that has national health care and does not want the rest of the country (the workers paying their medical bills for them) to have it. I could list many more entitlements that you and I are paying for for that generation has received that we will never get.

Meanwhile my own parents have not one but two retirement homes. The one good thing - at least my parents know I paid for them. Unfortunately, none of their friends get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. All of the SCLM..
believes it is their duty to present "balance" rather than facts. If they percieve the truth to be biased, they'll report the spin as truth instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenus Sister Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. The truth is not left-wing
Fuck Brokaw.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. The more important thing, IMHO is this
F911 was not a political ad; it was a film. The critique the member of the audience addressed was that the nightly news kept re-airing the ad and making it a story when there was no money to keep it on the air. It became a self-fulfilling prophesy and it was never investigated until several weeks after they had given it a good portion of attention.

This isn't about cable news, either, because they can be forgiven in certain ways for laziness because they have so much time to fill up. The nightly news has ~22 minutes a night to fill and it wasted TONS of time airing this ad and talking about its implications before it bothered to look into its veracity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. May a pox light upon Brokaw and all those of his ilk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC