Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH:... Kerry saw the same intelligence I did....STOP IT NOW !!!.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hot Water Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:22 PM
Original message
BUSH:... Kerry saw the same intelligence I did....STOP IT NOW !!!.
This is their last, and latest desperation rope they're hoping to hang on to, as they're going off the cliff.


What a load of crap. A President sees ten times the intelligence reports a senator does.

Is he trying to imply Kerry saw the PDB--"Bin Laden determined to attack within the United States?

Kerry has to PULVERIZE him on this point. And right now. Before those weak minded undecideds buy into it. Saying, well if Kerry knew the same thing Bush knew and voted yes, Bush must have been right to go to war.

They're too stupid to know Kerry only voted to give him authority as a last resort.

He has to kill this dead, NOW!! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. My reply:
"You criticize Kerry for voting for an unjust war.. but you are the guys who think it -is- just. So shouldn't you be thanking him?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry said he was going to trust *, as I recall.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotefurKerry Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Why would he trust that dope?
That's not good if that's Kerry's argument.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Link please n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. So? They cooked up the intelligence.
Edited on Thu Oct-07-04 05:28 PM by Mountainman
It was false and they lied to Kerry and all of Congress. They should be held in contempt of Congress.

This is the next piece of truth the public needs to hear from some creditable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Agreed, someone should ask Shrub
where the intelligence Kerry saw came from. Did it come straight from the CIA or the NSA....or did it come from the White House after a bit of
"creative modifications"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Exactly.... 2 Points..... Bush is IN CHARGE of the Intel agencies...
He's reponsible for it's accuracy.

#2. Congress did NOT see all of the Intel. For example the 8/6/01 PDB that Bush had and ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah well Kerry didn't see the Aug. 6th PDB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. My Reply (for Kerry)
"No I didn't. What I saw was "cooked" intelligence that your administration cherry-picked to only support your well known desire to invade Iraq no matter what the real, true facts were."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQ Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. The Dem on Paula Z's town hall
said basically that to counter the Rep in the debate who used that 'Kerry saw the same intelligence'

So they have that response field tested now. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Before the war, they said they had intelligence they couldn't show
to anyone. You would assume that the pResident gets much more information, than anyone one else in the whole friggin country. I bet the Senate Intel Committee doesn't get to see even half of what the pResident gets to see.

Plus Senators don't have there own National Security Adviser to read and interpert all of this information for them.

The only way that Kerry could have seen the same Intel, was if Bush didn't bother to look at the Intel. Then you might be able to say they 'saw' the same information.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. He said that at least twice during Debate 1, and I still don't get it
Edited on Thu Oct-07-04 05:33 PM by rocknation
Does he mean that it was stupid or gullible of Kerry to agree with the intelligence, or that he should have been smart enough to realize it was faulty? And how would Bush himself answer those questions?

He showed Congress the intelligence he WANTED to show them, and now we all know it.

:headbang:
rocknation



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Kerry can use Shrub's discomfort with his daddy issue
and kill two birds with one stone.

Kerry can say that he didn't vote for the 1991 war becuase he had concerns about the rationale, but Bush 41 was an honorable man. Based on that experience, he voted in favor of Shrub's bait and switch authorization on the assumption that he was also trustworthy. "I was wrong."

Clean it up and it would be a killer statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here is the comparision
I read a book.

You ask how was the book?

I tell you my summary on the book.

Do you know all about the book now?

No, you know what I told you about the book. In most cases that is okay, but what if I didn't like the book, wanted to disparage the author, Misread information contained in the book.

Kerry and the Senators and the congressmen saw so much LESS information than the pentagon showed the Commander in Cheif. You can't release all the top secret information to our government or it isn't top secret!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. cheney had his own govt set up within white house
to decipher thru what they wanted that would promote war and get rid of what suggested no war. also he used intimidation on the cia agents if they didn't give him what he wanted.

we knew this at the time, almost, and we know it now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kerry should answer back with what happened to the pages
that were torn out. I don't think anyone saw the same intelligence
they did.

America Tore Out 8000 Pages of Iraq Dossier
Current and former UN diplomats are said to be livid at what some have called the 'theft' of the Iraqi document by the US. Hans von Sponeck, the former assistant general secretary of the UN and the UN's humanitarian co- ordinator in Iraq until 2000, said: 'This is an outrageous attempt by the US to mislead.'

Although the five permanent members of the security council -- the US, the UK, France, China and Russia -- have had access to the complete version, there was agreement that the US be allowed to edit the dossier on the ground that its contents were 'risky' in terms of security on weapons proliferation.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1222-02.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kerry and the rest of congress
Saw the *Cliffs Notes* version. I think it is a good and accurate meme to describe what happened, no? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. When BushCheney say "intelligence agencies"......
...they are including the OSP. So they'll say "intelligence agencies said this", when one of said "intelligence agencies" operated as a front for their already established positions, cooking the intel to suit their agenda. This has not been addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no safe haven Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Exactly.....
This is the bottom line. Kerry needs to make the distinction between “mainstream” intelligence and Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz’s OSP who manufactured the lies for the consumption of not only the American people but the entire world. And what does it say of * when it was his own hand-picked gang of liars that fabricated this travesty in the first place? If * had “the same intelligence as Kerry”, then that’s proof enough that * knows nothing of what is going on under nose (at the very least).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Maybe Powell will come out and talk about the OSP
Someone creditable should step up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Would it be fair to say that the purpose of the Office of Special Plans
Edited on Thu Oct-07-04 06:32 PM by rocknation
was to circumvent the intelligence gathering of the CIA et al in Iraq.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no safe haven Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Looks that way from where I'm sitting
But then I'm a cynic.:evilgrin: There was ample other intel demonstrating that the tubes and yellow cake stories were outright lies, but your boy (and *mine* = Howard) CHOSE to follow the OSP/PNAC agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hot Water Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kerry campaign kills this....it's over.
It's his only hope. He said it again today.

He has to make people believe Kerry would have done the same thing if he was President. All the other news is killing him daily.

This has got to be blown away. I don't know why Kerry didn't do it in the debate. But he has got to debunk, crush and humiliate Bush on this point before it gets legs to the undecideds.

This is the ONLY thing Bush has left to try to sell. Kerry has to convince the country this is absurd, as it is pathetic. Or, IT WILL BE SERIOUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fool me once...?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kerry was not the president at that time - you were
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kerry sees much more information than Bush does...........
Bush is the most intellectually lazy man on the planet. He never looks at ANYTHING that's given him. He has his Cabinet members and aides look at it all and give him thier assessment.
Now, Kerry did NOT have access to all of the information that the Cabinet members had,not even close.
Another lie by the Bushies to escape responsibility for their actions. They're NEVER wrong, even now they won't admit their monumental fuckups.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. "Kerry saw the intelligence I WANTED him to"
is a more accurate statement. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hot Water Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. It's as if he's trying to imply Kerry was as misled as he was.
That should win the academy award for balls of the year.

Kerry was only a senator at the time of his urgent need to invade. As an officially nominated candidate for President, I believe both are kept currently up to date with all incoming information.

But not when he was merely a senator. Not only that, there were all kinds of cautions, caveats and disagreements between the very members who were providing the intelligence that only Bush saw. That was made blatantly clear in the 911 reports.

But people don't know this. Hell, 35% still think Saddam was smoking his victory cigar when the towers fell.

That's why I can't emphasize this enough. Right now they're scrambling to find another cup to put the ball under. They're desperate to find cover. They've been playing three card monty from day one.

Kerry has got to just humiliate him and drive it like a nail into his coffin, on this absurdity in front of this large audience Friday. Do not let this become another Swift Boat illusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The last dot to be connected...
OSP. The Bush admin. is guilty of fraud and an illegal invasion of a sovereign country, Iraq. This can be proven. Will Kerry have the stones to do so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC