SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9-23-08
A federal judge accused the U.S. Department of Agriculture of ignoring the law on government involvement in political campaigns Monday and ordered the agency not to spend any money collected from egg producers on ads against a state ballot measure that would ban cramped cages for hens and other farm animals.
A government lawyer described the ads as "neutral and educational" and said they were unrelated to the Nov. 4 initiative, Proposition 2. But U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel of San Francisco was skeptical of that claim after hearing from a Humane Society lawyer that the government-backed ads featured a No on 2 spokesman with a message that dovetailed with the opposition campaign's theme.
"They seem to have ignored the statutory proscription," Patel said, referring to a law that bans spending federally regulated funds to influence government policy.
She ordered the USDA to extend through Nov. 4 an agreement it accepted last month to refrain from spending any money under its control on advertising aimed at California voters.
LINK:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/23/BA9K132SDK.DTL&hw=proposition+two&sn=001&sc=1000--------------------------------------
As if you needed another reason to vote yes on 2...