Ahhnold's prop. endorsements

[HEIL PRESIDENT GOD]

What do you think? I have trouble keeping all these propositions straight in my head with the presidential campaign distracting me. Is voting against Ahhnold across the board a good idea?

This would boil down to

NO on:

1A
59
64
69

YES on:
63
66
67
68
70
72

[Robbie67]

1. YES on 59, NO on 68

other than that, you got it

[lilsourgoose]

2. Your instincts are correct, but he got it right on a couple of those

The lefty L.A. Weekly has a pretty good endorsements page with detailed explanations of all those California propositions and recommendations for the "liberal" voter...I found it very helpful when voting.
Check it out here:
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/48/news-endorsements.php

[AlbertoMo83]

3. Thank You for posting that

[HEIL PRESIDENT GOD]

5. Thanks for the link

Seems like a non-glib discussion, for once.

[displacedtexan]

4. LA Times endorsements link

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/2004/editorials/

Proposition 1A: Yes.
Proposition 59: Yes.
Proposition 60: No.
Proposition 62: Yes.
Proposition 64: Yes.
Proposition 65: No.
Proposition 66: Yes.
Proposition 68: No.
Proposition 69: No.
Proposition 70: No.
Proposition 71: Yes.
Proposition 72: No.
L.A. County Measure A: Yes.
L.A. City Measure O: Yes.

[LWolf]

6. I don't think it's a good idea.

Not that I wasn't influenced; if I was unsure, Arnold's endorsement pushed me away. Still, looking at your "opposite" list, I'm going yes on 59, and am still undecided about 1A.

I'm voting no on 68 and 70, and yes on 71, which isn't on your list.

[Davion]

7. Actually I think he is no on both 68 and 70 (Based on his commercials) n/t

Edited due to TO MANY FUCKING PROPOSITIONS IN THIS STATE!!!!!!
sorry

[theoceansnerves]

8. no on 68.