Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tell CA Secretary of state to end GOP crony vote counting.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:09 AM
Original message
Tell CA Secretary of state to end GOP crony vote counting.
Why do republican companies count nearly all our votes?


This is the first I've read about this fact, and it's entirely unacceptable, particularly when you look at some of the results that defied polling predictions by swings of up to 16%.

Those of us old enough to remember more than two or three elections know that exit polls are extremely accurate. Networks used to be able to accurately call before the polls even closed. Now both exit polls, major pollsters like Zogby and Harris are wildly off the mark. I read Zogby the day before the election, and he predicted a Kerry win of 311 electoral votes, and the exit polls were on track with that until 1:36 am, probably a good 5-6 hours after their final results are known, and well after they had a large enough sample to determine the outcome.

This is an irritating, math intensive issue, but it has a profound effect on the quality of our life, the kind of schools we have, whether we are a largely middle class society or more of us slip further and further away from financial stability, whether our soldiers go to other countries to kill and die, and whether we get to choose our own leaders.

After you read this, take a minute to contact our secretary of state and tell him this is beyond unacceptable.

Elections@ss.ca.gov



KEY EXCERPTS:

GOP counts nearly all votes


Here’s a shocking fact. The reason it was so easy to steal this election is that, unlike the situation in Europe, where citizens count the ballots, employees of a highly secretive Republican-leaning company, ES&S, totally managed every aspect of the 2004 U.S. election. That included everything from voter registration, printing of ballots, the programming of the voting machines, tabulation of votes (often with armed guards keeping the media and members of the public who wished to witness the count at bay) and the first reporting of the results—for 60 million voters in 47 states—according to Christopher Bollyn, writing in American Free Press. Most other votes were counted by three other firms that are snugly in bed with the GOP. “Any actual counting of votes by citizens is very rare in the U.S., except for a few counties in Montana and other states, where paper ballots are still hand-counted,” Bollyn explains.

Four major companies control the U.S. vote count: Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia and SAIC. All of them are hard-wired into the Bush campaign and power structure. The Bush government gave them millions to roll out computerized voting machines. Diebold chief O’Dell is a top Bush fundraiser. Diebold’s Election division is headed by Bob Urosevich, whose brother Todd is a top exec at “rival” ESS. The brothers were originally staked by Howard Ahmanson, bagman for the extremist Christian Reconstruction Movement, which advocates the theocratic takeover of American government. Sequoia is owned by a partner member of the Carlyle Group, which has dictated foreign policy in both Bush administrations and which had employed former President Bush for quite a while. The State of California recently received a settlement of $2.6 million in its lawsuit against Diebold for lying about the security of its voting machines in Alameda County.

****

Then, in 2003, what’s known as “black box voting” helped Arnold Schwarzenegger, who had deeply offended female, Latino and Jewish voters, defeat a popular Latino Democrat who substantially led in polls a week before the election—in strongly Democratic California.

See the rest of this article at the link below.

Electronic Voting


How the Grinch stole the White House . . . again
By Alan Waldman
Online Journal Contributing Writer
http://onlinejournal.com/evoting/112004Waldman/112004waldman.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sd_UDO Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. How we can count OUR votes (no Secretary of State needed)
Here's my idea--->

My message is--elect Democrats every 2 months---

Here's how we can paint ALL of California and South Dakota Ultra-Blue! This will work for any state in the USA--do this in your state- start an UDO group!

After the election, I decided to change things. I decided we needed to have our own elections-- 6 times a year!

Check out UDO!

Wanna OutBLUE people in a Red County? Check out my Yahoo Group--

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sd_democrats_UDO /

Let's start a state wide UDO (Ultra Democratic organization)--

first elections December 2004!

(Anyone can join the Yahoo group)

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. sorry, but what is it with the Giant Post?
I am not real savy, but it's hard to read on my screen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. large letters for those with ADD
I'll dial it down a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sec. of State Office responds
Thank you for your email. Secretary of State Kevin Shelley has asked the Elections Division to respond.

The county elections offices conduct the elections, not the vendors.  The counties, not the state, pick what vendor to provide their voting system.  The state only certifies the systems. 

Staff from the Secretary of State's office met with Bev Harris and other representatives from blackboxvoting.org specifically to discuss security issues.  In response to these concerns, Secretary Shelley ordered a series of 23 additional security measures for all touchscreen/DRE voting systems used in the November election.  These included election day testing of voting systems, banning the use of wireless technology and requiring that paper ballots be available at the precinct for anyone who requested one.  These security measures are available online at http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_vs.htm.
 

Further, Secretary Shelley required that the use procedures for all Diebold systems using the GEMS election management software be modified to add additional security measures.  These included specific security measures to prevent the type of tampering you described including not allowing for DAO programs capable of the type of manipulation you described on any computer running GEMS, requiring the central computer to use anti-virus and firewall technology and that users be given individual and unique logins and passwords.  These procedures are available online at http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_vs.htm.


In addition, Assembly Concurrent Resolution 242, which Secretary Shelley supported, was adopted by the Legislature this year.  The resolution requests that our office investigate and evaluate the use of open-source software in all voting machines in California.


Secretary Shelley remains committed to making all necessary improvements to voting systems in order to ensure elections for which everyone can have confidence in the results.

 

Sincerely,
Elections Web Mail Representative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC