EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 06:58 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Poll: What to do about Feinstein? |
|
Reality check to see if there's support to replace Feinstein or at very least, to get her attention. (If that's possible.)
Feinstein is voting for defense contractors (she is one), enables our worst trade deficits with China (she's a stakeholder) and against health care consumers in California AND nationally (she has stock in Magellan Health Care, a bilker of Medicare and Medicaid).
Please post clarifications, strong opinions or alternative suggestions. Please post constructive remarks if you reply to this OP; we've enough on our hands, no? (This is the first poll I've tried, so sorry in advance if problems. Beth)
|
Liberty Belle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. FYI, Feinstein plans to oppose Gonzalez as AG. |
|
That's good news, but I'm still upset with her for supporting Condi and voting the wrong way on other issues.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. there's nothing to be done |
|
Feinstein will serve in the Senate as long as she wishes. No Dem in california could beat her (or even try) and her seat is safe in the general election.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. don't see it happening |
|
but I'll vote against her in the primary
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |
4. As I started the poll, I won't post until it leaves the front page. n/t |
beanball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Feinstein,vote for Barbara Lee.
|
imenja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 04:41 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Why not work on replacing Schwartnegger? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |