Cuban_Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 08:48 AM
Original message |
I just want to say 'thanks' to all of you here. |
|
This forum has been the model of decorum and decency, and moderating it is a breeze. Thank you all VERY much.
:loveya::D
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
1. A welcome respite from General Discussion? |
davsand
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Hey--who you callin' weenies? |
|
You saying we're a bunch of stoners or somethin--we're "mellow" or somethin? Man, what are you--some kind of freeper???
:evilgrin:
Didn't want you feeling like we don't need you or appreciate you!
Laura
|
Tweed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
You are the best moderator. Although, I think I might have just started a potential flame war with the Obama post. Sorry!
|
seventythree
(904 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
are flames bad? I thought they showed high activity, that's all, but I see references to them every so often as a bad thing. Please explain.
|
Withywindle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Well, there's flames and there's flames |
|
The flames on the list of posts mean high activity and that is often good.
"Flame" in the general sense means people spazzing out and calling each other "freepers" and "DLC infiltrators", often over whether Politician X is a hero or a goat. That's bad.
|
seventythree
(904 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
DrGonzoLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Only DINOs such as yourself would say idiotic things like that. Why the fuck are you even still allowed to post here?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message |