This morning's edition of
The Des Moines Register features a story on "hot voter groups," i.e. the so-called NASCAR dads, "security moms" and the rest of the current demographic-consultant drivel. And, after reading the entire story, it is drivel.
What is not offered on
The Register's Web site edition are sidebars of "typical", actually stereotypical, "hot group voters."
I'm passing along the "typical" NASCAR dad,(P___ D____ of Des Moines has been a NASCAR fan for about four years.)because a good friend of mine, who is a passionate Democrat, works with this guy and is the president of this guy's union local.
Wealthy John Kerry a NASCAR fan? D___, a Republican who watches NASCAR races wvery week, isn't buying it. "Kerry would be a Le Mans man or something like that," he said. "I was joking with my co-workers yesterday that if Kerry said he was a NASCAR fan, he'd probably say 'Dan Earnhardt was the best driver ever." (For NASCAR naifs, the late, great driver was Dale.) D____ voted for Bush in the last election and is again leaning toward voting for the president. "He seems to have a clear picture as to what's going on, what he's going to do, how he's going to do things."
The obvious questions are:"How many NASCAR drives can Dubya name?" and "Other than the Dayton 500 photo-op stunt, how many NASCAR races has the ersatz-cowboy king attended in the past three years?"
Unfortunately, that wouldn't matter to a NASCAR
aficionado of four years. He'll vote for the party that denegrates his work, jeopardizes his job through privatization schemes and wants to rob him and his family of his Social Security benefits because John Kerry supposedly doesn't know squat about NASCAR.
No wonder my buddy gets frustrated over some of his fellow union members from time to time.