I had actually planned to vacation in SD this year but needless to say, I have since changed my plans and I made sure to let them know why. SD has definitely seen the last of my tourism dollars. Here's a couple more links that shows how the legislators voted in case you want to contact them to let you know what you think. Looks like I'll be busy this weekend sending out emails.
http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2006/rollcallv022018.htmhttp://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2006/rollcall1746.htmI don't know about you but I feel so much better knowing that SD is pro-rapist. From an article on yahoo:
If a rape victim becomes pregnant and bears a child, the rapist could have the same parental rights as the mother, said Krista Heeren-Graber, executive director of the South Dakota Network Against Family Violence and Sexual Assault.
"The idea the rapist could be in the child's life ... makes the woman very, very fearful. Sometimes they need to have choice," Heeren-Graber said.
Link to full article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060225/ap_on_re_us/abortion_south_dakotaHey, rapists have rights too ya know. :puke:
Unreal. Disgusted and outraged doesn't even begin to describe how I feel about the bill. Hmmm...I might be wrong on this but wasn't there something awhile back about the MN DMV outsourcing a contract to some business located in SD? Maybe we need to pressure our legislators to keep MN tax dollars in MN instead of sending them out of state. If we can put the squeeze on SD at the same time, that's even better.
On edit: Correction. Oops. Not the DMV. It's the DNR state parks reservation services that we have oursourced to SD. Hey, I had one letter right anyway. ;) Here's a link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=160&topic_id=2023Looks like I'll have even more emailing to do this weekend. I'll definitely be hammering our legislators on this one.