RidinMyDonkey
(290 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 09:31 PM
Original message |
|
I'm more than happy to pounce on Norm for anything but I don't understand where this is coming from. A few days ago I got a poll call asking me if I thought Norm Coleman could have done more to prevent Meth use in Minnesota (I answered yes, even though I had no idea what the guy was talking about) Then I was on yahoo just now and there was an ad in the corner saying the same thing. Is this a hot topic that I'm unaware of? Or is it something that should have more focus on it but is getting swept under the rug?
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I got a call about that, too, and said No Opinion for that question. |
|
I think a pro-Democratic outside group decided to make that an issue through web-ads, and now they're trying to measure if they persuaded anyone to vote against Norm Coleman.
I never heard of Norm Coleman's vote on a bill involving meth being controversial in any other context.
|
ISUGRADIA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Meth the only issue they cared about and my use of the internet seemed important
|
wellstone dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-03-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I got one too, my answer |
|
"I have no clue." The pollster laughed at that.
|
ogneopasno
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-03-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. When I see "Norm Coleman" and "meth" all I can think about are his nasty teeth. |
carlos3k
(26 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 02:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Unsettling to say the least... I'm just getting used to the high road and am enjoying the ride.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |