Looking for positivesRegion slips further in annual report card on economy but there are some good signs
Saturday, November 20, 2004
By Corilyn Shropshire, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Pittsburgh's ranking as a metro area that creates and retains jobs went from bad to worse this year, according to an annual study by a California think tank, but it wasn't all bad.
The Milken Institute did note that some well-paying local jobs were being created, in the construction, health care and finance industries, and that the region's high-tech sectors were growing but still trailed counterparts elsewhere.
The Santa Monica-baed economic development researcher annually ranks the 200 "Best Performing Cities" based on job creation, the types of jobs, income growth and pay, and high-tech performance. By those measures, Pittsburgh's overall ranking fell to 132 from 96 in 2003.
Not surprisingly, Pittsburgh was hurt by short-term job growth -- or, more accurately, by ongoing job losses, with its ranking in that category falling 15 spots to 152. The six-county area shed 24,000 jobs from the past two years, and is expected to end this year down several thousand once the final numbers are in.
MOREYeah, the last four years have been GREAT for us :grr: