Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eight positive tests in 16,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:25 PM
Original message
Eight positive tests in 16,000
AAS 7/10/09
Eight positive tests in 16,000

AUSTIN, Texas — Another 16,000 steroids tests of Texas public high school athletes caught eight cheaters.

The University Interscholastic League on Friday released the latest results of the 2-year-old program. They show that about 45,000 total tests have confirmed 19 cases of steroids use.

Given so few positive results, state lawmakers have agreed to scale it back over the next two years. The Legislature slashed spending for the program from $6 million to $2 million.


What a huge waste of taxpayer money! This program should have been slashed to zero! Two million dollars is still a hell of a lot of money to be wasting. I wonder which of Perry's business friends is reaping the rewards of a state contract? :grr:


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. one-half of one-half of a percent!
oh god, the horror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gulftrout Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gotta send a Message
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 06:36 PM by Gulftrout
Strickly by the $$ spent/per caught using steroids ratio this program is a failure.
A message has to bev sent to kids though. I have to believe that the kids using steroids are
being protected by win at all cost coaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mp9200 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah!
Terrible, isn't it? (sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aragorn Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. how would one find out?
Seriously. I guess if one knew a coach who knew enough this could be checked out.

BTW which company runs the Tx Medicaid drug program, and which former (p)resident got them the contract to do so when he got lots of $$$ from them to get elected governor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's our lege
Penny wise and pound foolish. Or in a lot of cases, just foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Another example of Perry's waste of money
AAS 7/12/09
Perry's border Web camera program misses goals

AUSTIN, Texas — Gov. Rick Perry's border Web camera program is out of money after a first year that fell far short of the goals for arrests and reports of illegal crossings.

An internal report showed that just 17 of 200 cameras — one for every 70 miles of the 1,200-mile Texas-Mexico border — were installed with a $2 million federal grant received last year.

Reports obtained by the El Paso Times indicate that nearly 125,000 people registered as "virtual Texas deputies," but those extra eyes led to just eight drug busts and 11 arrests. The cameras were expected to generate 1,200 arrests.

About 300 illegal immigrants were reported to the U.S. Border Patrol, far short of the 4,500 expected.

Texas Border Sheriffs Coalition chief Don Reay says the goals were unrealistic.


Unrealistic? No shit! Two million dollars for 17 cameras which led to 11 arrests. How does this incompetent Governor get away with this kind of performance? His hot air is enough to be a contributing factor in global warming. :grr:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What a boondoggle!
Two million dollars sounds like a lot of money, but for two hundred cameras that's just $10,000 per position. Considering that the cameras would have to be installed in remote, inhospitable locations, weatherproofed, tamperproofed (to the extent that that's possible), powered, networked back to a control station somewhere, 10K/position is pretty unreasonable. The fact they only got 17 cameras going before blowing through all the money makes me think that they awarded the contract to someone who had no idea what they were doing. Maybe those who DID know looked at the project and decided there really wasn't enough money in it to provide a functioning system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC