Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 09:15 AM
Original message |
Darth_Kitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I would.....the alternative is too scary.... |
Harper_is_Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
2. NOOOOOOOOO! Only the liar Layton will protect "working people"! |
|
WORKING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We gotta protect them!
CORRUPTIONCORRUPTIONCORRUPTIONCORRUPTIONCORRUPTION!!!! (should I say it again?) CORRUPTION!
:rofl:
|
iverglas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
There might be somebody who will believe you ... who wasn't already too stupid or nasty to worry about anyway ...
I kinda doubt it, myself. But you're doing a fine job of convincing anybody who isn't that stupid and nasty of something, so don't be stopping now.
|
Harper_is_Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. WHAT are you TALKING about? |
|
Keep saying what?
If you want to engage me please try to make it relevant to the post your replying to.
thx.
|
iverglas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. just in case you're actually admitting to being that dim -- |
|
-- you could try reading the header of the post of yours that I was responding to.
So it goes like this.
you: Only the liar Layton will protect "working people"!
me: Hey, keep saying it
you: WHAT are you TALKING about?
Now, do you really want to admit to being so dim that you don't know what I was talking about?
I'll try and spare you some blushing. I'll cut out the extraneous bits:
you: liar Layton.
Seeing it yet?
How 'bout if I stand over here?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |