Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada to sell out military to US?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 03:27 PM
Original message
Canada to sell out military to US?
That's the general gist of this article;
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1146174636411&call_pageid=968256290204&col=968350116795

Continental integration by stealth

"The BPG is, in actuality, advocating co-operation at the level of a single, U.S.-dominated command for all of Canada's territory and our surrounding seas. Under this plan, the entire Canadian Forces, unless deployed overseas in operations not led by the U.S., could find themselves under American "operational control" with Americans making all key day-to-day decisions...

"The BPG also recommends closer co-operation in security and foreign policy: "Canada and the U.S. must continue to act as partners; indeed ... the partnership must be expanded, to shape the future of North American defence and security, using all of the instruments of diplomatic, economic, informational and military power."...

"Ottawa intends to follow this recommendation when it brings the new NORAD agreement, complete with a provision on maritime surveillance sharing, before Parliament in one or two weeks...

"The fourth, most ambitious alternative involves "a truly integrated approach to continental defence and security through a deliberate melding of defence and security functions." This would be achieved by "establishing a single organization responsible for all-domain, bi-national warning and execution in the realms of defence and security."

This fourth alternative — full integration — is presented as the ultimate goal of improved co-operation."

---

May I heartily recommend against this?

Let your MP know, this is bullshit. Just say NO to hegemony.

How low will Harper sink? About eye-level with W's belt-buckle is my guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The only difference is the label.
The fact is that the Canadian Forces' role as a defender of Sovereignty has been operating on information filtered and supplied by the US military for decades. With the exception of coastal S&R operations, virtually all CF operations at home and abroad are dictated by intelligence supplied by the US.

The DEW Line and the entire operational arm of NORAD has been under the direct control of the USAF since the early 1950s, despite the fact that most of the physical presence of these systems is on Canadian soil (or in some cases "Canadian ice").

Joint exercises with the US military have always been geared to the Canadians adapting to American procedure.

Most of our military equipment is build by US companies, or European companies owned by US corporations. Even our Army's own rifle, the C7/C8, which is manufactured in Quebec, is licensed from Colt.

Our own "special forces", the JTF2, receive advanced training, including interrogation techniques, from the JFK Special Warfare School at Fort Bragg.

In reality, there's not much of a leap from where we are now to actually being a part of the US Military.

Unfortunately, many of the locals in the regions in which we're deployed already believe we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC