Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canadian Election Coverage vs American Election Coverage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
yvr girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-04 02:41 PM
Original message
Canadian Election Coverage vs American Election Coverage
Do our networks use exit polling to the same extent that American ones do? I always see results given in actual votes with a reference to the percentage of polls reporting.

I don't really see this in American coverage of their elections. They seem to have a complicated system of prediction in place. Am I wrong?

We use paper ballots for goodness sakes. Their voting systems are much more automated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. An American view...
I've seen the CBC coverage on election nights a number of times, including the last election.

Your ridings are much smaller than our electoral units, more in line with the size of some of our state legislative districts. So it would be less possible to do reliable exit polling to cover these districts. In even a small state, like West Virginia (population 1.8M, 5 electoral votes), you could set up three dozen exit polls at precincts, each representing a group of like-minded precincts based on past elections and census data. When the polls closed, you might have enough data to decide on a winner. Or you might only have to wait until a few precincts were counted to make sure your polling was accurate enough.

BTW, paper ballots work great. I've done punch card voting machines, paper and optical scanned paper ballots, electronic voting, and I've even punched my own holes in my ballots when voting absentee on a punch card ballot (I never knew the mess that left was called chad until a certain election). I'll take paper anytime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u4ic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Even on US election night
The CBC had the numbers up far quicker than any of the American stations I checked. In one instance, it took CNN almost half an hour to make the change the CBC had earlier.

However, from what I understand, the American stations were being more cautious this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's no time
Because we're using paper and have lots of volunteers and KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING, the real results are out in time for the 11 p.m. news. Exit poll information would be useless. Nobody minds the wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. We do not use exit polling at all, I believe...
We have the regular polls prior to the election itself but no exit polls. The US system is so convoluted partly because each state is responsible for the process by which the election will take place: type of ballots, type of ballot counting systems, etc whereas our system is federally mandated with the rules the same in all provinces. I MUCH prefer our system, it is simple, cheap and fair!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironflange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're right, no exit polls
And this time around, the pre-election polls were way off. I think Harper had his cabinet all set out and ready to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL, yep, he was 'ahead of the game' as it were...
I figured it would be a minority Liberal govt right after the scandal broke and I have to admit, even though I am a Liberal supporter, it was needed. I very much believe a strong opposition makes for good government and the previous Parliament held too big a majority for the checks and balances to kick in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC