Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else find it ironic, re Homolka:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:25 AM
Original message
Anyone else find it ironic, re Homolka:
She's seeking a court-ordered injunction on press coverage of her post-release life.

"Why ironic", you ask?

Because she fears for her privacy and safety, and doesn't want to be stalked and vulnerable.

You know, like her victims were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jon_da_brockman Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, as much as we hate it
she DOES have the right to privacy. She didn't give her victims a chance, but she did serve time (though most would argue not enough) and now that she has her freedom, she does have the right to saftey and security, even if she doesn't deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. She is asking for unbelievable restrictions and painting herself
as a victim yet again, disgusting, imo. The press has the right to cover her just as they do anyone else who is in the public eye, no more, no less.

I hope she is never left in peace, she has 'earned' her notoriety, let her get her just desserts in terms of being outed by the media. I don't want her in my neighbourhood and would want to know if that were to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mother Jones Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ditto
I hope all the post-release press attention can make up for the bad deal the Crown made with her. It's our only hope for true justice to be served in this case.

Do you think someone will really try to kill her? Being apathetic Canadians and all that.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, having lived in St. Catharines for a time...
...I do know of certain elements who could pose a credible threat to Homolka.

I like the judge's ruling today; that she has to live with the consequences of her actions, and that the authorities are under no obligation to offer her special protection.

It almost restores my faith in our legal system. Almost.

She, like all other citizens, has the right to go to the police with any specific information re any threats to her safety, and they have the obligation to protect her at that point. Until then, she gets the same average protection as anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mother Jones Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I went to high school in St. Catharines
so I also feel very close to home on this topic.


I remember stopping in front of the Bernardo home when the police trailers had surrounded it, continuing their investigation. The drapes were all closed, but you could still see in through various parts of the windows, even from the road. It was a chilly feeling that left you sick to your stomach. I'll never forget it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. A guy I knew...
...his family's backyard connected to Bernardo/Homolka's backyard. The police back-hoed their yard looking for...who knows...at the onset of the investigation. My friend's little sister used to let Bernardo walk their dog. Creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. We're stupid for even entertaining it.
She's a threat. To acquiesce would mean that we could never know what she's up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. True that...
Homolka has all the earmarks of a pathological narcissist and strikes me as a danger to re-offend, which given her record, could be horrendous. I'd want to know if she was planning to come anywhere near me... After what she's done, she's forfeited her right to anything but continuing to breathe and think her dark, crazed thoughts. The rest of us need to be protected from any of those thoughts being translated into actions.
:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC