Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cor who would have thought it? And certainly not planted.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:03 AM
Original message
Cor who would have thought it? And certainly not planted.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7326006.stm

I thought it was only Muslims who had been shot for not being terrorists that kept kiddie porn on their 'puters?

What's the betting he confesses his guilt to his cellmate?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Morris Onions Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. In this case,
I reckon there might be something in it.

Just a hunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. For what it's worth ...
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 06:28 PM by non sociopath skin
... one of the sad facts that those of us who are working with those from dysfunctional families come up against time and again is the "abusive cycle". A mother who has been abused as a child subconsciously seeks out similarly abusive males as partners in the hope of somehow "making up for" her "inadequacy" in being abused.

So, ipso facto, they choose abusive partners - and their children become victims in turn...

Social services and police psychologists who are involved in cases like Shannon's got the t-shirt long ago ... which is why she wasn't returned home straight away IMHO.

If I were involved in the case, I would be actively investigating the possibility that the "abductor" really thought that he was rescuing Shannon from an abusive situation. And that she went with him because she was being abused or feared being.

No religion. No politics. No police heavy-handedness. Just the darker side of human psychology ...

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wondered about that
But if the "abductor" was really a "rescuer", how could he expect to get away with it for long? He couldn't keep the kid under wraps indefinitely. Maybe she went to him for help, and he didn't know what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. All of which may be true
and clearly they think something is amiss. And yet...having had plenty of time to question the child and the alleged abductor, and the family, all they come up with is kiddie porn on a PC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. ALL they come up with, Mr. C?
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 08:07 AM by non sociopath skin
I would have thought that a guy who enjoyed downloading child pornography moving in with a mother and her young children was an accident waiting to happen.

And I suspect that it happened.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well it may have done
but he hasn't been charged with anything else so despite having had a very long time to investigate him they don't seem to have found much evidence of anything else. And he hasn't been found guilty of downloading child porn either yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Perhaps my hunch is wrong, Mr C ...
... and your hunch - that this guy is blameless (other than enjoying sexual pictures of children) is right.

We shall see.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually my hunch is
that he is blameless of enjoying sexual pictures of children. As to the other I have no hunches either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Entitled as you are to your opinion, Mr C, I fail to understand why ...
... you're quite so adamant on this point.

But, as I say, we'll see ...

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well...the thick plottens
judging by the recent arrests and charges it begins to look like it might have been some kind of scam. Fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Scam?
Do you know more than has been reported? So far, in addition to the supposed abductor, the arrests have been:

The stepfather, on suspicion of possession of child porn;
His sister, on suspicion of assisting an offender;
His mother, on suspicion of attempting to pervert the course of justice;
And now the child's mother, also on suspicion of attempting to pervert the course of justice.

The BBC says "Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice can cover a wide range of actions but one suggestion is that when Shannon first disappeared, Ms Matthews might have known more about her daughter's whereabouts than she told police". So I think the charges so far are consistent with the stepfather being an abuser, and all the other adults involved knowing that, and either assisting him, or at least not reporting him.

One way or another, it's looking like an ugly situation, but I don't see why you conclude it's a "scam".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think your take on it seems quite likely
The arrests of mother, sister and wife may well just be about covering up for the stepfather's child porn (assuming that's a true charge - but I agree with others above that the police wouldn't have much reason to plant it on the stepfather for reasons to do with Shannon). It could be possible that they knew, before or after, about the porn (or the police think they must have known) and helped in covering it up. Whether the stepfather is involved in the abduction seems impossible for us to know, so far - I'd imagine the police would have done a search of any computer accessible to the close family members some time during the case, and maybe they just found the stuff without it having a direct relevance. Or maybe it does. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Or, with respect, maybe we should just wait and see.
It's not a TV Soap. It's real.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morris Onions Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Imagine 'em sitting about their house...
scoffing turkey twizzlers & chips and chugging down the Special Brew when on the box comes the news.

While desperately searching beneath the discarded fag packs, pizza boxes and general household detritus for the telly remote so they can switch over to Eastenders or whatever, one of the brighter ones hears something that makes his ears prick up...

"Oh I say!" he remarks, "Did you hear that?"

"No, please enlighten us."

"Well, it appears that the parents of the McCann child who has most unfortunately disappeared on the continent have raised a rather large sum of cash from well wishers keen to help with the search."

"Oh really? You don't say. Did they happen to mention how much?"

"Well, unless I am very much mistaken, a figure of one million pounds was mentioned....."


All eyes turn to Shannon.....



Just a thought! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You should submit a script to ITV
Maybe you could get a two-part post-watershed drama out of this. What's the endgame, though? Either the kid needs to be found eventually, at which point the gravy train is in serious danger of going into reverse (you can't expect a 9-year-old to reliably present a convincing story), or she needs to be killed and disposed of before cops are crawling all over. Did the uncle get cold feet about strangling and burying her?

It's possible. But until more facts emerge, I prefer to go with the simpler scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morris Onions Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. ITV? Never!
It's Auntie Beeb or nothing!

Incidentally...

Shannon Matthews' mother 'may have copied TV kidnap plot'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/08/nshannon108.xml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. And on the other hand, the Torygraph may have made it up.
I'd rather wait for the real outcome, thanks.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morris Onions Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. oh, without a doubt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Interesting, isn't it, that the caricature of "chavs" now seems as acceptable ..
... on left-of-centre sites as it is among the Daily Mail crew.

Guess I'm old enough to remember when the Working Class were figures of admiration rather than figures of fun and derision.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. As a kid of a working class family
I agree wholeheartedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morris Onions Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Then I guess you must also be old to remember when..
the Working Class actually did some work!

;)

This and the above all very much tongue in cheek Mr Skin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Tongue-in-cheek and foot-in-mouth often go together, Mr. Onions
I sometimes wonder where "having a bit of fun" ends and "trolling" and "flaming" start ... :evilgrin:

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morris Onions Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Eh?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Granted!
:evilgrin:

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. I tend to agree with non-sociopath-skin here...
In the case of Menezes, there was a pretty obvious motive for planting. There doesn't seem to be an obvious one here.

Of course, people are innocent till proved guilty, and we *could* turn out to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC