Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New target acquired; Republican Electors.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:39 PM
Original message
New target acquired; Republican Electors.
Friends,

I propose that we need to prepare lists of all Republican electors in the nation for the purpose of contacting them directly to convince them to change their vote to Kerry.

We'd need; Name, home address, phone number, FAX number, and email address for as many Republican electors as we can find.

We should also prepare contact materials so that people will have an idea of what arguments might work with a Republican. I think we should impress upon them that their future safety depends on a Kerry victory, as Bush has mismanaged things to the point of making us all less safe daily.

Comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ahyums Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. haven't said this often... but no chance
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 11:44 PM by ahyums
the only conceivable way this could possibly work is if some iron clad proof of fraud came in and even then I'd have my doubts. These people are not swing voters or undecideds they are at the heart of the base and no amount of emailing or letter writing is likely to change their minds. I really think this would be a waste of time and energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No chance whatsoever if not tried! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ahyums Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. but as you mentioned somewhere else 100,000 phone calls
someone would have to make those calls and I'd still be willing to bet my house that they would not make a bit of difference I really think there are more productive ways to spend that kind of time out there. It's a nice direct thing to do, but I think if you try or you don't there is no chance whatsoever. If we were talking about 268-271 or something then you might, might get 2 or 3 to change and it would be worth it (even then I think whoever was made president under those circumstances would probably have an impossible time of it) but no way on earth are you going to get 20 or more to switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deansyawp Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I agree, this would be a waste of time
These folks are wingnut loyalists, they are the last people that would budge. There would have to be ironclad, absolutely ironclad proof of fraud, with criminal cases being drawn up before any of these folks would even think of changing their minds. And even then, knowing how the modern Republican mind works, I'm not sure they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. aren't most of them Repukes?
the ones in my state I actually recognized are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. By definition.
A Republican Elector is a loyal party member.

Not an easy sell.

But maybe 100,000 phone calls might do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In TX, one of the electors is...
The man who introduced W & Pickles. They've been close friends since the dawn of time. He's as loyal as they come. 100 MILLION phone calls wouldn't do it. They're all like him. The only way they'd NOT cast their vote for * is if * himself ORDERED them not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. That was Don Evans
He was my congressional district's elector last time. Just resigned as Commerce Secretary.

These are the type of people chosen as electors.

Good luck switching them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mostly_lurking Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. No, you'll just piss them off
and make it less likely to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badc0der Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes, but Bush isn't
On most of the traditional republican values Kerry is a better republican than Bush. So this could work, if done properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's so crazy it just might work...
Still not totally convinced but impressed by the out-of-the-box thinking... And wondering if a "Dubya's not a real Republicant" arguement might have teeth...

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. electors are selected precisely for their unwavering loyalty
their ONE function is to cast their electoral vote in the way the ticket expects them too, so they are chosed exclusively for their loyalty.

occassionally you get an irrelevant abstention or electoral vote for someone's aunt or whatever, but never where it remotely matters.

the only time the actual electors can really come into play would be if one or both of the winning ticket candidates were to die before the electoral college met.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Careful with your language
I know what you meant by "their future safety depends on a Kerry victory" (I hope) because you clarify in the remainder of the sentence but these words could be easily misconstrued especially when the subject heading refers to "targeting" people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry2win Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I took that as bush
will attack anything he wants to, leaving the whole world in danger. I think you have a warped way of looking at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I thought I said that
I thought that I said that I knew what they meant. I just don't want them to have somebody kicking in their door in the middle of the night on a trumped up terroristic threats charge brought by some wingnut bu$h elector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. That is why I clarified it...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lasttrip Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. hey, you never know.
its only been a few weeks but some people are starting to wake up. just give them the facts. I've got 2 repubs to thinking twice just by bringing up mandatory mental health screenings, loss of h.i. deduct, etc. and talking non-part.

keep educating. cant hurt. some will get it.
soon i hope.


:hippie:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niche Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yes!!!!
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niche Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. Don't know how to set this link but here's a start.
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 12:56 AM by Niche
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JWP Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. 1 in W. Va. already said he'd go renegade
One of those GOP electoral votes WON'T be cast for Bush.

Of course a mass persuasion effort won't make the majority of GOP cast their votes for Kerry -- in many of the state's laws it would be illegal for them to do so.

BUT .... they can and might withhold their vote if we convince them there is just as much distrust here as in Kiev!!!!

If electors fail to cast the necessary 270 votes, the election goes to the House, which will elect Bush. But, at least it's proof that democracy prevailed and it was government that made Bush president (like it was the SCOTUS last time) and again it was not the people's voice.

So, please, pursue the list of electors and their phones and emails. I'll be watching here for them and I will participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Got revoked
Richie Robb reverses course, now leans toward president Open this result in new window
Charleston Daily Mail - Nov 03 8:12 AM
A disgruntled West Virginia Republican elector said Tuesday he likely will cast his Electoral College ballot for President Bush after all because he won West Virginia by such a wide margin.


http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news/?ei=ISO-8859-1&c=&p=west+virginia+elector
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. He changed his mind
Said he'd now vote for Bush since Bush won WV so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkusQ Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. IIRC, one already has said he would...
There was a news story a while back claiming one Bush elector was already contemplating not voting for him as a protest. And it has happened over a hundred times in the past 200 years, most recently in 2000.

--MarkusQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhgatiss Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. I said this weeks ago...
I think getting a few thousand people to protest in some of these folks front yards might be a big wake up call as to the fact that there are a lot of people who think their vote for Bush is reprehensible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC