Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OHIO: Lucas County elections board certifies Nov. 2 results...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
sled Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:36 AM
Original message
OHIO: Lucas County elections board certifies Nov. 2 results...
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 08:39 AM by sled
Lucas County elections board certifies Nov. 2 results, prepares for recount

http://tinyurl.com/68aak

By FRITZ WENZEL
BLADE POLITICAL WRITER

Article published Thursday, December 2, 2004

The Lucas County board of elections certified the results of the Nov.
2 general election yesterday, closing one chapter in the historic vote
and laying the groundwork for another.

Immediately after the certification vote, the board discussed plans
for an anticipated recount of the presidential election.

The board's certification came less than four hours before a deadline
mandated by Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell.

(snip)

In Lucas County, of the 5,379 provisional, military, overseas
civilian, and hospital voters, Mr. Kerry won 3,662 of them, or 68.1
percent. Mr. Bush won 1,701, or 31.6 percent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. why are there so many invalid procisional ballots???

same article....

"The percentage of invalid provisional ballots in Lucas County was unusually high, said Carlo LoParo, spokesman for Mr. Blackwell. He said an average of 25 percent of provisional ballots statewide were found to be unacceptable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Based on what
Carlo LAPORE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Probably due to redistricting.
Note: I am just guessing, but last time I think 90% were valid. This time however there was some redistricting. Since voting at the correct precinct is a requirement for a provisional to be valid it would make sense that more would be thrown out this time.

Personally I think you should get a "break" if you went to the same place you voted last time but your precinct had changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC