Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida hand recount of 3 counties; does anyone have more details?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:32 AM
Original message
Florida hand recount of 3 counties; does anyone have more details?
Miami Herald hand recount of 3 Florida counties indicates signficant Kerry gain and possible Kerry win in Florida
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/20021...

Here are the tallies for Union County:

Bush original: 3396 Bush hand count: 3393 (-3)

Kerry original: 1251 Kerry hand count: 1272 (+21)

Net change: Kerry +24

Here are the tallies for Lafayette County:

Bush original: 2460 Bush hand count: 2452 (-8)

Kerry original: 845 Kerry hand count: 848 (+3)

Net change: Kerry +11

It's a bit more complicated for the third county they looked at, Suwannee County, because they only report the totals for a hand

count of "almost 60%" of the ballots. Here is the result of their 60% hand count:

Bush 60% hand count: 6140

Kerry 60% hand count: 2984

Which gives us the following tally for Suwannee County:

Bush original: 11153 Extrapolation of Bush 100% hand count: 10549

Kerry original: 4522 Extrapolation of Kerry 100% hand count: 5126

Net change: Kerry +1208

In the original count, 71.2% of the votes cast for Bush or Kerry (n=15675) went to Bush. In the hand count, this drops to 67.3%. That

is a significant drop. Let's translate that into numbers. If you take the percentages from the hand count and extrapolate, here's

what you get:

Bush = 15675 x .673 = 10549 (loss of 604)

Kerry = 15675 x .327 = 5126 (gain of 604)

Net change: Kerry +1208

A switch of 1208 votes in a county with less than 16K votes cast is obviously huge. Now maybe there's a very large percentage of Bush votes in that remaining 40% that they didn't count, but we can't know that because they didn't count them. Which begs the question...why did they stop counting in Suwannee County when their tabulation of 60% of the ballots deviated so much from the original total? And without actually counting those remaining ballots, how can they possibly report that nothing is amiss when the data they have so far suggests a possible problem?

What I see is a possible gain of 1243 votes for Kerry from three small counties in which only 23627 ballots were cast. That

represents about 0.3% of the ballots cast for Bush and Kerry statewide. If Kerry gained votes at the same rate statewide, he picks up nearly 400,000 votes and wins Florida.

another source:

http://ap.indystar.com/dynamic/stories/F/FLORIDA_VOTING?SITE=ININS&SECTION=POLITICS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does anyone have details for numbers in Suwannee County?
The original source of the data is no longer there; does anyone have access to the data to check all the details of the numbers in Suwannee County?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I have a hard copy
of the 'unofficial' election results from their website on 11/17/04.

I also spoke briefly to the SOE there.

The Miami Herald counted only the precincts that they wanted to count. However, looking at the demographics the voter registrations and population seems to be pretty evenly spread except for precinct #1 that went heavily in Kerry's favor. My guess is that was the black part of town?

However, since the rest of the county is pretty homogeneous, your figures should hold up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They counted the precincts that went most heavily for Kerry
Which is what you would want them to do (short of recounting the whole county/state).

Virtually the entire discrepancy was in "spoiled" ballots that they could discern the will of the voter where the machines could/did not. Obviously, the precincts with the highest Kerry vote would be the ones most likely to produce extra Kerry votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. There is no way to know without counting the whole county
I would tend to suspect the precincts that went heavy to Bush, which were the precincts that they avoided.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry. I'm afraid it doesn't work that way.
Just like some counties lean more left or right than others... precincts WITHIN counties can have substantial differences as well.

You can't take 60% of a county and extrapolate it to reflect the full county and assume that 1200 vote gain.

What they did was only count (about) half of the precincts. But they then compared their hand count results for those precincts to the reported count. There was almost no variation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I counted one house.
Both adults voted Kerry.

That extrapolates out to a 100% vote for Kerry in Florida. Carrying it further, I don't think Bush got any US votes at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woody Box Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. The case has already been investigated here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woody Box Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Another link with nice graphics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. That recount set out to prove everything was fine.
As far as the authors are concerned it achieved that goal.

One thing that was amazing was the emails someone here posted from one of the reporters, these people aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer. Reading the reporters questions brought home the fact that half the population really is below average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC