Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMPORTANT - What website received the Repugs emails with caging lists?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 03:20 AM
Original message
IMPORTANT - What website received the Repugs emails with caging lists?
Do you guys recall, days before the election which website was it that was cleaning its default email box and came across the emails from folks with the Shrub's election campaign that were sent to their site instead of the shrub's folks? The satire site was a .org and the campaign emails were supposed to be sent to .coms.

One of those emails had a caging list for voters in Florida, remember?
Apparently the caging lists were part of the fraud.

Is that site still in existence? Maybe they have intercepted other repuke email that would be beneficial to the investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. the site was georgewbush.org
Edited on Sun Dec-05-04 03:29 AM by kgfnally
and you're right, it was a satire site that the bushbots thought was part of the campaign.

The site is still up: www.georgewbush.org

There is no search function.

I do believe the list can be downloaded here: http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/attachments/Caging-1.xls

Here's another file: http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/attachments/Caging.xls

Oh, hell, here's the page I found them on: http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/index.asp

Have fun! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's it - the Jacksonville caging list -- Thanks for the links
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Griffin - Research/Communications
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:34 PM
To: kporter@rpof.org; Lindy Landreaux - Political ; Miriam Moore - Research/Communications ; Victoria Newton - Research/Communications ; Shawn Reinschmiedt - Research/Communications ; rkammerdiner@rnchq.org; sshiver@rpof.org; bdoster@georgewbush.org
Subject: Re: caging

Thx
Tim Griffin
Research Director and
Deputy Communications Director
Republican National Committee
310 First Street, S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20003
w:(202) 863-8815
f: (202) 863-8744
tgriffin@rnchq.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly Porter
> To: Lindy Landreaux - Political ; Miriam Moore - Research/Communications ; Victoria Newton - Research/Communications ; Tim Griffin - Research/Communications ; Shawn Reinschmiedt - Research/Communications ; rkammerdiner@rnchq.org ; Stephen Shiver ; bdoster@georgewbush.org
> Sent: Thu Aug 26 18:12:49 2004
> Subject: caging
>
> Total as of today is 1834.
>
> Kelly
>
> ATTACHMENT: Caging-1.xls

=================
Link http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/index.asp

Maybe Palast or Madsen or Conyers would like this list? :shrug:
Maybe this site hasn't checked its default box lately and has received other email?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanwoman Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. These guys were the source for Palast
in his October reporting on the BBC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Awesome! I was just thinking about this.
So good to know we don't ech have to keep track of everything. If we each remember some stuff, the collective has access to the knowledge.

Thanks for posting.


....

PS: Tell me I didn't just infer that DU was Borg-like. <grimace>
Scary thought, but true in a way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did you go check out the site again?
Edited on Sun Dec-05-04 04:02 AM by merh
The emails highlighted in yellow weren't there the last time I looked at this site. There is a yellow email that is very interesting.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Carr's Blackberry
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 5:57 PM
To: Rich Beeson ; Cary Evans ; Scott Stewart ; Goose; mhouser@georgewbush.com; hmpatterson@rnchq.org
Subject: Fw: douglas county voter confirmation

This is actually from carson and douglas

-----Original Message-----
From: "Christopher M. Jaarda"
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:54:38
To:chris@nevadagop.org
Subject: douglas county voter confirmation

Chris,

Attached is the excel document with the returned mail from Douglas County.

Chris Jaarda

Chris Carr
702-258-9182 p
702-258-9186 f

ATTACHMENT: Douglas County Voter Fraud Master Spreadsheet.xls


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I did go, but didn't see any yellow highlights.
Is the email in your post the formerly highlighted email? If so, I can't make heads or tails of it. I did find the stuff about caging, and the spreadsheet, but don't know what it all means.

Signed, intheflow a.k.a. bear of very little brains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Confirmed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Check out post 5, then go look at the site.
Edited on Sun Dec-05-04 04:10 AM by merh
They actually have a document entitled Douglas County Voter Fraud Master Spreadsheet. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geo Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is likely a list of possible fraud cases in the registration data....
The USPS codes indicate that the ballot was undeliverable.

But why would they make a point to e-mail this? What is the significance? - G
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. More importantly, why was the list made on or before Sept
20, 2004?

Curious isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. And I really don't understand your explanation.
What USPS codes? Please explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh I remember!
I saved the info on a word document, that one is in it, do you want me to send it to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC