Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone help me out? What is a spoiled ballot exactly?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
ClintCooper2003 Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:50 PM
Original message
Can someone help me out? What is a spoiled ballot exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Winamericaback Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. No presidential vote
The machine can't verify a presidential vote on it. They SHOULD be then hand counted. They usually aren't leading the the disefranchisment of thousands of voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. A spoiled ballot is an overvote or an undervote (no vote)
there are 93,000 spolied ballots in ohio that have either no vote for president or too many candidates selected for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintCooper2003 Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But if someone accidentally votes for two different candidates...
for President, wouldn't that automatically invalidate the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes that is why it is spoiled, but an undervote can be counted
if the intent of the voter is clear. With punchcards the chads may not have completely detached. On an optiscan the bubble may be circled instead of colored in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You assume a double-punch is a voter error. Why?
Let's say you had a lot of punched card votes, like Gore did in a lot of Florida minority precincts.

What would you do to make sure these votes were never counted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Overvotes can be legal votes also. Gore had thousands in 2000.
Overvotes(punched twice) can be legal votes also. Gore had thousands of overvotes that were legal Gore votes in Florida in 2000, but they weren't counted due to improper election proceedures. Several counties such as Palm Beach, Duval, Gadsden, etc. had butterfly designs where it was possible to vote for the same person twice. Once on one page under the candidate and another on a another page where a voter could write in the candidate's name and vote for him. Voters in some precincts were warned by election officials to vote in all vote groups, so they voted for Gore in the first group and also in the second group. But the voters intent was clear and under Florida law thats all thats needed. But they could only be counted by a hand count and that was denied. They should have not automatically discarded votes when the second vote was for write in
(and the write-in was the same candidate voted for). But that was the only way Bush could win. Gore had thousands of legal "overvotes" that would have insured his win if counted, without worrying about hanging chad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Two votes for the same office, a 'Hanging Chad', a write in cantidate
filled in but not filling in the circle by RIGHT IN CANTIDATE.
Ther are a lot iof ways to spoil a ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. It a nutshell a non-valid vote. What constitutes an valid or invalid
votes depends on the method of voting (paper ballot, datavote/lever, optican scan, punched card/votamatic etc)

Here's an excellent resource (with images)
http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/fl/ballot.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mockmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. A ballot
marked in favor of Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. FINALLY!!! One I know the answer to.
A spoiled ballot is a ballot that can not be read by the machine. It is NOT an undervote or an overvote. Readable ballots that for whatever reason don't have a vote for a particular office or have too many votes for a particular office. Those are, strangely enough, called undervotes and overvotes, respectively.

It is absolutely incorrect as a matter of election law in every state that I know of to call an undervote or an overvote a spoiled ballot.

Examples of spoiled ballots are ones that have been wrinkled so that they are unreadable (this happens A LOT in absentee ballots). Sometimes the absentee ballot clerk cuts through the ballot when they open the envelope with the letter opener. That is a spoiled ballot. Sometimes the ballots get things spilled on them or people try to erase pen marks and end up making holes in the ballots.

At the precinct, a spoiled ballot is one that the voter messed up or the votamatic messed up and the voter asked for a new ballot. The old one is a spoiled ballot.

Again, it is incorrect to refer to a ballot with an undervote or an overvote as a spoiled ballot. I know its not sexy or exciting but an undervote should be called an undervote and an overvote should be called an overvote. A spoiled ballot is one that is either: (1) in the tabulation sense completely unreadable or (2) in the poll operation sense a discarded ballot from a precinct that goes into the spoiled ballot bag.

Thanks for asking, I finally got a question that I knew the answer to! woo hoo!

Now, just because one calls something by its correct name DOESN'T mean that they shouldn't ALL be looked at very carefully and analyzed for readily discernable votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You get three points for this one, you are 100% correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC