Katherine Willey filed an affidavit: Media loved it!

[FullCountNotRecount]

It later proved to be false but it was so interesting they had to report it. I hope they treat the computer fraud programmer's affidavit that way because it is interesting even if it may be false.

[Sparkle]

1. It was about sex. That's more important than fraud.

[regularjoe]

2. Pardon my ignorance, who is Katherine Willey? n/t

[thedevilinthedetails]

3. She was as Clinton accuser

[unpossibles]

4. well, then of course

the "liberal" media reported on it!

[pbartch]

5. What does this have to do with the 2004 Election results?

[quiet.american]

6. Affadavit question

I checked out the .PDF and observed it is notarized, but my question is, who requested or took the sworn affadavit from Mr. Curtis. Or did he just walk into a notary and pay his two dollars?

(Should I be suspicious of this whole thing because the guy's first name is "Clinton"? Meaning would this be a "Rather-ing" of Democrats by the Rovian ones?) Just some questions on my mind.