Buzzflash changed its Headline on the Curtis affidavit

[ourbluenation]

When they first posted it it said...

"If True, This Report Blows the Lid Off of E-Voting Manipulation in South Florida."

and that was it - Now it says...

"If True, This Report Blows the Lid Off of E-Voting Manipulation in South Florida. Or is This Revelation a Repeat of the Dan Rather "Memogate" Set-up by Rove, This Time Planned to Undercut the Credibility of the Internet? We Don't Know. Stay Tuned."

Looks like they may have some doubts? 100,000 apologies if this has already been posted.

JTT

http://www.buzzflash.com/

[Obviousman]

1. Not to jinx anything

But I had this in the back of my head all day. We saw how it crushed Rather, let's just tread verrrrrrrry lightly on any information we get. Don't treat anything like the silver bullet. The combination of everything must build this story.

[jamboi]

4. I totally agree. There is no silver bullet. It is the rushing horde of

facts coming from all directions at once that will crush the strongest fortress. Don't rely on any single leader, strategy or angle. Be flexible and willing to shift to a different strategy if necessary.

[LittleClarkie]

6. My question from another thread was

Why would Feeney be so loose-lipped toward Curtis? I don't get that.

[AtLiberty]

15. Curtis was Republican for many years...

;)

[Nordic]

9. Yeah, but you know what? We're not Dan Rather

We're a bunch of people investigating this thing on our own dime, on our own time, for the sake of our country.

We're doing it with complete visibility, hiding nothing.

Can't compare the two

[Straight Shooter]

2. It's either a masterful hoax or the bush*t will hit the fan

Someone has gone way out on a limb.

BradBlog is reporting that Curtis' 3-year-old German Shepherd, which has been healthy, is now reported as dead.

What kind of person would sacrifice their dog to make a name for themselves? His story had better be real, or there won't be words low enough to describe someone who kills an animal that has got nothing to do with any of this election crap.

[IAMREALITY]

3. I know Straight, that was horrible news and made my stomach turn.

Amazing what some friggin people will do...

On a side note, I posted in the other thread that I did a quick experiment. I printed out the last page on my photo printer then scanned it on my scanner using the default fax & copy setting. The results were almost identical to the other 3 pages. Fonts, characteristics etc all meshed.

[JoMama49]

7. Remember the Anthrax?

It was only sent to Democrats and journalists. I put nothing past these thugs!

[Skip Intro]

10. "What kind of person would sacrifice their dog to..."

" make a name for themselves?"

- the kind of person doing dirty work for the bush gang. (not that Curtis is that type of person, just answering the question...)

Words to describe a person who'd kill an animal for political points - the same words that would describe bush/cheney/rice/rummy/powell/etc.

[bunny planet]

11. I think Madsen mentions in the most recent article that a man's pet dog,

a Pomeranian was killed. BradBlog just posted that this is the second time Curtis has had a dog killed. Is Curtis the same whistleblower that Madsen refers to in his fourth article. Sorry if this has been mentioned in another thread, I've not been at my computer most of the day so I haven't checked.

[carolinalady]

14. poisoned--no mention of killing

[bunny planet]

17. It is implied that the dog was poisoned deliberately as some sort of

retribution for the whistleblowing, which would make it....murder of said animal and thusly killing.

[jamboi]

5. Doubt is a good, useful tool, and it won't stop the truth from winning out

[Skink]

8. Nice to see

There are to many people on the Brad Blog to get in. Maybe this has teeth.:mad:

[quiet.american]

12. Waiting for John Conyers

It will be interesting to see what John Conyers makes of this.

It will also be interesting to see what YEI has to say.

[rawstory]

13. YEI has nothing to say.

Called them twice. Also Feeney has nothing to say either. Just FYI (http://rawstory.com)

[quiet.american]

18. 'Bout what I expected

Thanks.

Did come across this interesting "background" on his fellow whistleblower, Mavis Georgalis:

http://www.flfen.org/os30apr3.htm

1st District Court of Appeal

A Whistle-blower - temporary reinstatement of state employee

... A former state worker is entitled to temporary reinstatement under the WhistleBlower's Act because her letter of resignation - presented to her as the only alternative to a letter of termination - amounted to an actual discharge, the 1st DCA held.

Mavis Georgalis, a manager for the Department of Transportation, was called into a meeting and shown two letters, one submitting her resignation and the other advising her that her services were no longer needed. Georgalis accepted the resignation, she said, only in response to coercion. She then filed a whistle-blower complaint claiming she was fired because she participated in a complaint made by a contractor under her supervision. The Florida Commission on Human Relations concluded that Georgalis' departure from DOT was an actual discharge and requested her temporary reinstatement while the case remained pending. A trial court granted the request and the DCA affirmed, rejecting DOT's arguments that Georgalis resigned and was not discharged and that she was not entitled to temporary relief because the commission failed to follow statutory time periods for providing notice. The court noted that the statute does not provide any remedies when the commission fails to meet the time periods.

"The time periods contained within the statute constitute directions to FCHR to expeditiously handle complaints and seek relief for the complainant where it is warranted. It does not serve the legislative purpose to preclude a complaining employee from obtaining relief based upon FCHR's failure to follow statutory directives," the DCA said. @
PART II. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Court Opinions

Am staying tuned.

[Wordie]

19. Excellent point...but we should make SURE that the Conyers investigation

is known to be completely unrelated to the other stuff, as it truthfully is. Because if Conyers is tied to something that is later proven to be untrue, that will discredit the important work that Conyers is doing. So no matter what the truth is of any of these other stories, they should be kept separate.

[JohnOneillsMemory]

16. This story mentions things the neo-cons don't want even breathed about.

The AWOL story was sticking to W for years like toilet paper glued to his shoe that needed to be chopped off very publicly.

But this voting software fraud story has barely seen the light of day so I don't think that a big splashy false flag failure works for the neo-cons.

Lots of folks don't even know what's wrong with electronic voting and don't have it on their radar.

The neo-cons hide things so people don't reach three thresholds in the mind:

1) awareness
2) outrage
3) action

Because if these things come into play, the unthinkable might happen:
Democracy.