Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How widespread do you believe fraud was in this election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:10 PM
Original message
Poll question: How widespread do you believe fraud was in this election?
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 04:51 PM by jamboi
I'm curious to know just where DU'ers are on the fraud question. How widespread do you think election fraud was in the 2004 election? Please keep kicking this today so we can get a decent sample of those frequenting this forum. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. woa, y'all are scaring me! Bunch of Conspiracy theorists! ;-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dang! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
72. Shrub's new Presidential seal 'splains it all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this poll, jamboi
Great topic, and allows expression of a wide range of opinions without threat of getting cluster-bombed for being "different".

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks, that is exactly what I was aiming for instead of confining people
to a false dichotomy. Cuz I actually want to find out where people are at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Novak: "More doom and gloom from the Democrats" You Dems you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is interesting, I've been thinking about the "widespread" angle.
If you have problems in Ohio and Florida, it is a wide range of problems (geographically). But it doesn't mean every state between had them.

This is what I think is interesting to the "no national pattern" argument. If you tipped New York for Bush, it would be like denying you were in the cookie jar with crumbs on your sweater. But you could pad the vote in places like NY, Cal and red states for an overall margin, and tip it in swing states for the electoral college.

It wouldn't "look" like a national pattern. But it would tip the national election (and probably some locals).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, and the poll could be refined to take that into account. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. They shaved votes like crazy for their 'mandate'.
I live in NJ and the Republicans were constantly trying to make it look like it was so close here, NJ is 'in play' is what I heard for weeks. Jersey is as blue as you can get outside of NYC, always has been. They put the rumor out there that states were razor close, so that it would be less suspicious when higher numbers came in for * even in states that eventually went blue for Kerry. They did this is Hawaii too, even sent Darth Cheney there at the last minute because it was 'in play'. They shaved in Republican states as well, because there were tons of R voters that were changing their votes in this election. The whole thing stinks, in my opinion, not just Ohio and Florida, although the shenanigi in those two states positively reek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
70. suspect lots of padding in OK.....senate race is way weird...dem
leading strongly, but then Coburn 'won'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick to top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good Poll!
Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Option 6
All the way. There is little doubt in my mind that this election was a shame through and through!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Both a sham and a shame through and through. & appearently many others too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Massive fraud
Four years in the making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sorry to bother you with a PM again...
Hi Jamboi--I just couldn't figure out where the heck to post this, but I wanted to bring it someone's attention. Do you have any recommendations?

I was going through some old articles that I clipped from before the election and ran into a NYT article about the GOP crying about Dems intimidating *them*. Anyway, the last paragraph is:

"A group of 50 Republicans in the House led by Representative Tom Feeney of Florida sent a letter on Oct. 7 to Attorney General John Ashcroft suggesting the existence of "a plan to intimidate volunteers who were supporting their candidate" and requesting an investigation."

I found that really curious, anyway.

Thanks for everything, man,
kk897 (Kelly)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. oops, meant for that to be a PM, but if anyone *else* has any thought on i
it, I'd be happy to hear them.

Sorry!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Hmmm... that is interesting too. The pot..kettle...black??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Sure sounds like a disinformation campaign...
of the pre-emptive strike variety. Karl Rove trainee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Feeney? He probably taught Rove. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. I have been looking at DoJ "monitoring" of election complaints....
do you have the link for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Nice to know that each DUer gets to vote once
...and only once. Yeah, I tried voting twice just to see what would happen.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glugglug Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Does anyone actually believe NYC went less than 90% to Kerry?
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 10:06 PM by glugglug
I don't. Not for a minute. It's pretty damn hard to find a * voter here.

Should give an idea how much padding is going on in the obviously blue and red areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corbett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
48. I Don't Doubt It. He Won Berkeley, CA By About The Same Margin
Voters in both of those cities have a genuine hatred for Dubya. Kerry's broad margin of victory in both those places was a combination of strong Democratic unity and the "Anybody But Bush" vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yeah, there is another refinement
...you could do for Category #6: Catastrophic fraud, and that is, the election was a fraud going in. It was SET UP for fraud, quite deliberately. Or (and?), the election SYSTEM itself is fraudulent. What happened can't even be called an election.

There is solid, detailed evidence for this. Rightwing Republicans (Bush "Pioneers"!) owning the source code for the central vote tabulators as SECRET proprietary information. Bush "Pioneers" companies insisting no paper trail needed. Repug Congress PREVENTING a paper trail. Public having to fight for a paper trail (an auditable election) and only partially succeeding. Highly insecure code--using C++ and Windows. Cripes. Many whistleblowers pointing out high insecurity--companies resistant to security measures, secretive, defensive. Trust us.

This alone, the electronic aspect, is mind-boggling.

You might word Category (#7) this way: It's the end of American democracy. A completely illegitimate and unverifiable national election perpetrated by a fascist coup, to keep themselves in power, despite overwhelming prima facie evidence that the people in the country rejected their policies and their crimes, and voted to throw them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Cool, thanks! You know I'm really floored that #3 is not the most popular.
Probably if we do this DU wide that would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. I like that avatar
mind if I use it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Please do! It refers to the RedHandsMovement.com
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 01:28 AM by jamboi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Thanks for the link
looks like some others decided to use it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridadem30 Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
34. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
36. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. Check out this story in LBN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
43. Considering I'll go to my grave swearing up and down that Texas was
actually in play, yeah, catastrophic approaches the magnitude of the cock-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #43
59. No one will ever convince me that Florida went red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
45. Kick, but I think we know where DUers stand
And I think you are all a perceptive, intelligent and good-looking group!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. But not how many of them.

The poll still is a morale booster to watch that number go up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrydemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripmann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Morning kick from europe.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalloway Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
58. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
60. Catastrophic but largely typical
The abundance of shenanigans revealed by the GOP in 2000 were potentially shattering. They just piled up without notice of the salient fact how prevalent various methods of tilting and rigging and favoritism and intimidation could be. The padding of the popular vote is still not uncovered properly but the little stuff for sure, especially as it goes on and on under the "smoother" meme.

Retrieving the vote and protecting the vote has just not been done. That was an initiation not a preparation. Who could be shocked now at anything the Democrats or the media fail to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #60
75. Starting to think the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. That's a new thought for me. Monstrous! Unbelievable n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
64. #4 because we don't know how much there was. And that's the point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
68. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
71. I voted with the overwhelming majority.
Doubt of vote anywhere = doubt of fraud everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. Do you mean that you don't think there was widespread fraud or that you do
? Sorry I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC