skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 12:18 PM
Original message |
|
They (the House Judiciary Committee) are repeatedly calling for any and all data that will help them build a case that different technologies with different spoilage rates are a violation of Equal Protection.
First they need evidence of the different spoilage rates.
We've got some of that data. Let's have it at their desks before they get back.
Post what you send and to who:
Wexlar and Nadler both asked this specifically.
We need to work it up for Ohio too, they want that badly.
|
| tinfoil_beret
(204 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Paperless DRE = Vapor Votes |
| tinfoil_beret
(204 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I didn't pay attention to your request. I sent letters to several senators, but only a few made it to their destinations, including the ones to Sen. Kerry and Sen. Clinton.
In the letter, I explained that the nature of votes cast with paperless DRE machines made it impossible to accurately count these votes and thus provided unequal protection to these votes. I also pointed to the remedy for this violation of equal protection as given in the Fourteenth Amendment, which also brought Section One of Article Two into play.
|
| skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. np, still got time. Looking up the posts now. n/t |
| skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Sent them ignatzmouse's NM study... |
|
IIRC some of the California stuff had spoilage figures in there too?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
