Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Kerry or Edwards be the one Senator that the house needs to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:23 PM
Original message
Can Kerry or Edwards be the one Senator that the house needs to
contest the election when the electoral meets? :shrug:

I am sure this has been asked before and I am sorry if I missed the thread with the answer. I have asked this in a couple of other threads but am not getting an answer. I know someone here probably knows the answer. I am a newbie and every time I think I have some info or I have a question, you guys are on it! I love it here! Anyway here is the question:

Now that the house appears to be more than willing to stand up and contest the election when the electoral meets and it's been said that they only need one senator to do so, CAN Kerry be that Senator or is he disqualified because he was a presidential candidate and it's a conflict of interest? Can Edwards?

If the answer is "yes". Do any of you think that this may be the hail Mary we have been waiting for?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KeireG Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Absolutely. That would be one of the great moments in American history if it took place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Of course they could. Unlikely they would because that would look unseemly
but I bet someone will step forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyn2 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. Wouldn't it be great to have a republican do it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NY lib NY Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think....
the new congress counts the electoral votes so Edwards wouldn't be able to contest. However Kerry could, but it might look like a mere case of sour grapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gore didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gore should and could have
and so should Kerry. He has jurisdiction. My fantasy is that he is quietly amassing the evidence to present when he contests the College vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That is my fantasy too!
Although my biggest fantasy was Dennis K in the oval office. *g*

http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Gore was VP, not a Senator. Could he have done so?
I know he presided over the Senate as Veep, but he wasn't a Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. But he told the Senators not to speak out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. he did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Yes, he did
If a Senator would have signed on (which his VP candidate Lieberman could have done), the final decision would have come back to Gore... that is, he could have ultimately named himself as President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. what a frigged up process!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Gore was a wussy, Ask Sen. Bird!
I bet if we all started writing to Senator Bird (WV-D) I bet he'd do it. He's the guy with the constitution in his pocket. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I remember he was the "President" of the electoral meeting. I saw
Micheal Moore's movie Fahrenheit 9-11..when citizen after citizen came forth stating that they had been disenfranchised and he kept asking if they had a Senator with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. They were Congresspeople, not citizens
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 04:34 PM by meganmonkey
They were members of the black congressional caucaus. They needed a Senator to sign with them to move forward withtheir complaints and no Senators would sign.

on edit: I guess congresspeople are citizens, too :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. thanks for the clarity. I just briefly remember the scene and didn't
remember Moore's intro or description of it. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. No prob! I'm surprised I remembered the details...
It was such a powerful scene though.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yes, it was! I remember tears filling in my eyes at that moment along with
many other moments in that movie. Speaking of Moore..a lot of people, including myself have been wondering what he is up to lately with his new "look" and "aloof" attitude. Did anyone hear someone mention at the hearings today that he will be coming out with footage of the irregularities during the 04 election? OR were they being facetious in regards to the fact of that is what it will take for our congress and gov officials to hear us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. He said he was going to have hundreds of observers with cameras
at the polls, if I remember right. But I don't think anything has been shown yet. Maybe that's his next movie?

I don't know much about his new look & all - no TV here. So everything I know about the MSM and TV appearances, I learn here on DU. Certainly doesn't make me miss TV, that's fir sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Hey got to the forums. Moore's film just won "The People's Choice" Award
someone just posted about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
49. The V.P. is the "President of the Senate"
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 03:45 AM by Up2Late
He can only cast a tie breaking vote :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only one person is needed to contest Ohio
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 03:39 PM by AmerDem
It was brought up today by Jessy Jackson Jr. during the hearing.



" WP: What did you think about Rep. Conyers saying he might object to the seating of the Ohio Electors?

JB: I think if the recount is proceeding beyond January 6th, that it is the duty of any member of Congress, any member of the U.S. Senate, under their sword duty to the constitution, to prevent a President from being sworn in until it has been determined who won the Presidency. You cannot have an election that is called free and fair, and have people sworn into office, while the votes are still being counted."


http://www.truthout.org/cblog.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Love the Avatar! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Start using it
It refers to the Red Hands Movement. A fellow DUer passed along the info and others have started using it as well.

http://www.redhandsmovement.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Here us the response letter I got back from Senator Bill Nelson
Dear Ms. :

Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about the recent election.

As you may know, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) plans to investigate voter registration, electronic voting machines, and the processing of provisional ballots. The Election Assistance Commission
(EAC) also has announced plans to hold public hearings on voter registration guidelines, statewide registration databases, and provisional
balloting. The EAC is currently receiving election data from across the
country, including information on the use of provisional ballots.

Before the election, I supported several initiatives and legislation to ensure the accuracy of electronic voting machines. I will continue to monitor the situation, and I await the GAO's and EAC's findings so that we can improve our nation's voting process.

I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this issue. I will continue my efforts so all citizens have the opportunity to vote and feel confident that their votes are counted.


P.S. From time to time, I compile electronic news briefs highlighting key issues and hot topics of particular importance to Floridians. If you'd like to receive these e-briefs, visit my Web site and sign up for them at http://billnelson.senate.gov/newpages/newsletter.cfm .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Maybe we should start working on senators, especially
elder statemen like Sen Kennedy and Leahy, who are getting up in age and would like to go out with a bang! Letters calls emails pleas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I started firing off to senators from the "Senator Blast" that one of the
members posted and worked very hard on. I got some generic responses from some and what seemed to be a more personal one from Senator Bill Nelson here in FL, but the rumor is out that the re pukes are going after him next as they did Daschel. <------spelling of name. I will start blasting again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueatheart Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. same 2 that came to my mind
both are getting up in years, not far from retirement. What do they have to lose? Theres not much love between Bush admin. & Leahy, esp. after Cheney told him to f* off. Leahy has some guts, well at least thats my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
48. Awesome Idea! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewClarke Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
57. This topic keeps coming up . . .
. . . "What senator can we get to contest the electors?"

But I think it's a problem that will take care of itself: if it becomes obvious--and I mean REALLY, REALLY OBVIOUS--that the voters of Ohio actually voted for Kerry rather than Bush, then there won't be any shortage of senators willing to come forward and sign on for a protest. Voters being denied the opportunity to vote won't cut it for them, I think--it will have to be voters who cast votes for Kerry that were somehow counted for Bush, or votes for Bush that came from nowhere at all.

If it doesn't become REALLY, REALLY OBVIOUS, then all the emails and phone calls in the world won't make any difference at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think he should. It will look self serving. We need Dem w BALLS
to do it.

I'd volunteer but I ain't in the senate. I don't have BALLS perse I have ovaries but they can be just as deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. yes they very well can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delphine Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Edwards can't do it because
it occurs three days after the new Senate is seated. He won't be a senator then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. thanks..that answers one part of my question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatieB Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. You need someone who plans to retire after this term
because his career will be over (s/he) will be the focus of the worst Repug condemn machine in history - and remember - there is no majority in either house to back him up. There are some such senators out there - Lautenberg was mentioned earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ted Kennedy should do it for Kerry
Kennedy knows better than the rest of us, what this cabal is capable of. He's already lost 2 brothers to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. maybe do a massive push to get Kennedy on board.
letters, email, Air America whatever means necessary to get him to hear us. I have noticed that faxes seem to work better that email so I will fax him a request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Here's Kennedy's contact info
what the heck, it doesn't hurt to ask.


http://kennedy.senate.gov/index_high.html

315 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

202/224-4543


2400 JFK Building
Boston, MA 02203

617/565-3170


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I agree
I really can't see that Kennedy would be hurt significantly if he decided to contest the election.

However, I hate to be a pessimist, but... I really doubt that a Senator will come forward to contest this election. Considering none did in 2000 and taking into account all that went on then, I don't see them suddenly waking up and looking into what happened this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. but...The Dems thought they'd be controlling Congress for...
...years back then, after America got a little taste of W. Now they know just how much their inaction cost them. Maybe a senator would actually stand up this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kennedy, Byrd, or Biden
would be my choices - all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I blasted them. I will blast again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cory Laf Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Biden would probably be in the best position
He's quite a strong senator and in Delaware the only way he could be unseated is....*cough*rigged elections*cough*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. I'm a big Biden fan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noclonyofthechimp Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. exactly. I blasted him and got an auto letter back. I will do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
43. Perhaps Byrd. He was one of only TWO Senators voting against Intel. Bill
And he voted against the War. And he respects the Constitution more than most.
Though Kennedy or Biden would be fine too. Heck, I'm visualizing all 54 (?) Dem Senators stand up slowly, one by one on Jan. 6 and contest the Electoral Vote.:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think it should be other Senators
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 04:26 PM by proud patriot
not Kerry or Edwards ...That's why I included
Boxer in todays phone calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Sure, They have THEMSELVES to concern themselves about
And there's that "test" God is putting john through - this may not be one of the questions.....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Griffy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Edwards cant... Kerry wont... others can (Byrd, Obama...)
The new Senate is confirmed on the 3rd, Edwards we be out already, Kerry will be there and can, but I agree with those that say he shouldn't be the 1. Other Senators we might emplore.. if needed?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
51. Only if he has a band of Congressional brothers and sisters...
...standing with him should JK contest this. In fact, another thread is suggesting we "flip the Senator problem," here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=131829&mesg_id=131829&page=

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. And once someone objects, what would be the next step?
Once memebers of the House and Senate object to the results of the election in congress, what would happen next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. The seating of electoral college would be postponed, and...
...the House would decide what happens next. Now, sure, they're mostly RepubliCONs, but if something as major as a challenge to the EC happens - the last time was 1876 - they'll just be opening themselves up to those in-the-streets protests we've all been pining for and worse if they automatically seat Junior**'s electors.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
46. Lieberman's purpose in life
Fall on his sword for the voters and assure himself some sort of legacy. Also make up for him not standing up for Gore in 2000.
Won't happen, but he is my choice. :9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
53. It appears there's a chance that it might be Bill Nelson!
ELection Fraud 2004- We May Have Our Senator


http://www.changeforamerica.com/community/node/view/1803

Also, I thought someone mentioned a while back, that Senator Boxer was considering this as well. Anyone remember anything about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. It should be EVERY Senator who wants free and fair elections!
Byrd, Kennedy, Kerry, Boxer, Feinstein, Levin, Rockefeller, Biden, Mikulski, Sarbanes, Stabenow, Clinton, Schumer, Lieberman, Inouye, Jeffords.........

and any senator who doesn't sign will be opposing free and fair elections...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
55. Surely Obama will do this!!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. What about this wider concept...???
Fine to appeal to individual senators to stand up alone, but....

Another idea that has been suggested is to ask them ALL to stand up for this fundamental principle of democracy. Those who won't will appear obstructive to basic voting rights. Would have to get this idea out far and wide to have effect, so more of We (the People) would call for it. Big blitz. Even if those in congress dont do it, it gets the non-partisanship nature of the issue out there as a reasonable expectation. Challenge them all.

----------MORE HERE:
***See what has been discussed on this idea so far, go to the thread by smartvoter called

"Is it too arrogant to suggest we flip the senator problem..."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=131829

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmoney07 Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
58. Has anyone mentioned Bill Nelson from FL?
He said that he would do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. See my post above regarding Bill Nelson
Seems he is the one. We'll hope it's him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC