MSM piece on Ohio fraud on yahoo.com!

[ClintCooper2003]

Here's the link: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&ncid=536&e=1&u=/ap/20041210/ap_on_el_pr/unsettled_election

And an excerpt:

Doubts Persist About Election Results

43 minutes ago Politics - AP 12/10/2004


By RACHEL KONRAD, Associated Press Writer

As the Electoral College (news - web sites) prepares to certify President Bush (news - web sites)'s re-election on Monday, concerns persist about the integrity of the nation's voting system — particularly in Ohio, where details continue to emerge of technology failures, voter confusion and overcrowded polling stations in minority and poor neighborhoods.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All Election Coverage


Few mainstream politicians dispute Bush's victory, and the incumbent's 3.5 million-vote margin nationwide was wider than any of the reported problems, which included insufficient or incomplete provisional ballots and, in some places, brazen partisan shenanigans.


But that is not stopping a disparate assortment of personalities — prominent among them Democratic congressman John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, the Rev. Jesse Jackson (news - web sites) and presidential candidates of the Green and Libertarian parties — from questioning the accuracy of certified results and demanding investigations.

[Scout1071]

1. Read it....rated it

and kickin' this beeyotch on up!

[Us vs Them]

2. Vote it up people!

"and, in some places, brazen partisan shenanigans."

"If the Democratic leadership doesn't step up, why do they think that the activists on the ground — the people who collected millions of dollars, made phone calls and registered people to vote — would do it again in 2008?" said Don Goldmacher of the Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club of Oakland, Calif.

Thank you. We need to remind them, at times, that we are a major source of their income. We have the money, manpower, and the voice of millions.

[McCamy Taylor]

3. is AP responding criticism that it is biased towards the GOP?

The tone of this piece is different from the one described in the post on Thursday.