Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

39 voting machines unused in Ohio

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
ohioliberal Donating Member (458 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:23 AM
Original message
39 voting machines unused in Ohio
This was in the Columbus Dispatch today, I looked in the forums but
didn't see it posted.
http://www.dispatch.com/

Saturday, December 11, 2004
Mark Niquette
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH


In a development that came to light just this week, several extra Franklin County voting machines earmarked for Columbus’ inner-city polling places on Election Day never made it inside.

Officials can’t say exactly why, but they suggest the polls may have been closed or poll workers told those delivering the machines that they could get along with the ones they had.

The machines were among a group of 99 originally kept in reserve for emergencies. County Elections Director Matthew Damschroder said that the day before the election, he ordered that all 99 be sent to precincts where long lines were expected.

But 22 were left in the warehouse, and 17 of the 29 machines that officials tried to place on Election Day in inner-city precincts never were activated.

Damschroder said he learned the extent of the problem and other discrepancies this week — meaning officials have been giving the public wrong numbers on voting machines for the past 5½ weeks.

The issue of voting machines remains a hot topic because voters had waits of several hours at some polls. Some election critics also say precincts with predominantly Democratic or minority voters received too few machines while suburban areas didn’t.

Still, Damschroder noted the new information means that there were fewer unused machines than was thought, and he said none of the problems affect the election results.

He promised an internal review and changes if necessary to "prevent us from having the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing."

Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell’s office also plans an administrative review, spokesman Carlo LoParo said.

The state can make recommendations for improvements and, in cases where severe problems are found, place a county board under state administrative oversight, he said.

Thomas Rosenberg, a lawyer who helped monitor the election for the Kerry-Edwards campaign in Franklin County, called the revelations "disturbing" but said it’s too soon to jump to conclusions.

"We hope that it is nothing more than human beings made errors of judgment for which all we can do is take steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again," he said.

Damschroder released a report after the election showing that the county had 2,798 machines placed in precincts by the time polls closed Nov. 2 and that 68 machines were kept in reserve in case there were problems. Critics questioned why so many voting devices went unused despite the heavy turnout.

But after a meeting this week with key staff members, it became clear that 2,818 machines were sent out and that only 22 reserve machines remained in the warehouse, Damschroder said.

Damschroder said the discrepancies occurred because information from the board’s warehouse about the placement of machines wasn’t communicated with Downtown office staff members when he prepared his report.

Still, questions remain about why all available machines were not sent to the polls and used as intended.

Based on Dispatch interviews with Damschroder, a Republican, and Michael Hackett, a Democrat who is the board’s deputy director, here’s what officials say happened with the unused machines:

Franklin County kept 99 voting machines in reserve when the other machines were delivered before the election, in case there was a serious accident or a problem with a truckload.

After all of the machines were safely delivered Nov. 1, Damschroder said he instructed staff members to send out all of the reserve machines.

A Democrat, the manager of election operations, makes the recommendations about where to place machines based on voter-registration totals, past voter turnout and sites where long lines are expected.

But records show only 44 of the reserve machines were delivered Nov. 1, and an additional four machines were placed on Election Day.

When election officials called the county warehouse on the afternoon of Election Day to see whether other machines were available, they were told that only 29 machines were there — when there were actually 51, Damschroder said.

He couldn’t explain why the wrong number was provided.

Workers then programmed counting cartridges for the 29 electronic machines to be sent to inner-city precincts. But 17 of those cartridges never were activated, meaning they were never used by voters, he said.

Damschroder acknowledged that the technicians hired to make repairs and deliver machines on Election Day said they tried to deliver all of the machines. In some cases, the polls were closed or workers said they weren’t needed.

That means 39 available machines were not used for voting: 22 remained in the warehouse and 17 were never activated, officials said.

Damschroder has said that instead of using repair technicians to deliver voting machines on Election Day, the board will consider using the contractor that makes the bulk deliveries of machines before the election.

That should allow machines to be placed more quickly, especially because it takes up to 90 minutes to program and prepare each machine for the ballot used in the specific precinct where it is sent.


mniquette@dispatch.com

And the list just keeps growing in Ohio.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just more evidence the election should be OVERTURNED!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Can we say the Kerry votes were tossed?
unused sounds too nice.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was in line for 3 hours
Yep-we could have used some more machines at my precint. Damschroder is a hack, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why are Kerry lawyers letting them off the hook, if any of this really

will lead to overturning the election.

"We hope that it is nothing more than human beings made errors of judgment for which all we can do is take steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again," he said.

Give me a break.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am sure there we sevral dozen state wide
Look to Lorain County, I know that in Oberlin they suddenly produced more voting machines when the Democrats protested to the BOE.
I know where I was a challenger, there was one machine not used. I also know there were more unused "frames" or inserts for the machines that were not used.

I am sure this was a wide spread issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's plain nasty
Letting people stand in line getting pissed while those machines are sitting unused.
Amazing how we never had long lines or bad exit polls before the BFEE took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. FreePress Reported this November 16!!
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 09:48 AM by KaliTracy
After first set of experiences of irregularities was publically heard...

"One telling piece of evidence was entered into the record at the Saturday, November 13 public hearing on election irregularities and voter suppression held by nonpartisan voter rights organizations. Cliff Arnebeck, a Common Cause attorney, introduced into the record the Franklin County Board of Elections spreadsheet detailing the allocation of e-voting computer machines for the 2004 election. The Board of Elections’ own document records that, while voters waited in lines ranging from 2-7 hours at polling places, 68 electronic voting machines remained in storage and were never used on Election Day. "


See http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2004/990





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I bet they were used - then wiped clean - and put in storage
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Last minute surge of 'SHRUB' votes?
Hmm? Could this be the reason why people standing in line for hours to vote 'shrub' out, suddenly decided to vote for 'shrub' instead of Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Fitrakis talked about this at the Conyers forum - 68 unused machines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. ohioliberal
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source
and provide a link to
the source.

Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stella2cat Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. and there's that phrase again....
"none of the problems affect the election results"

yeah right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is there anyone else that questions the party affiliation of the
Democrats? Ever since Madame Butterfly (Theresa LaPore) an alleged Democrat worked hard to suppress/destroy Dem votes in Florida, I have no faith in the listed party affiliation.

Maybe we can some Dems to register Republican and work on the Board of Elections. The Repukes sure do a great job stacking that deck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTGold Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Still were MORE machines than needed in repug areas and less for Dems nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC