Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebold speaks out????? No Criminal record they say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:33 PM
Original message
Diebold speaks out????? No Criminal record they say
Is this real?

http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/printer_16087.shtml

From YubaNet.com

Op-Ed
Diebold response to Baneth piece
Author: Mike Jacobsen, Diebold, Incorporated
Published on Dec 10, 2004, 07:20



Regarding Robin Baneth's 12/9 op-ed Diebold sent the following statement:

For your information, the chief IT programmer at Diebold Election Systems does NOT have a criminal record in check fraud using computers, as Robin Baneth asserts in yesterday's column. Diebold doesn't employ any convicted felons as developers. The person I believe you're referring to, Jeffrey Dean, was never officially employed by Diebold Election Systems. He was VP of development for Global Election Systems, the company Diebold acquired in January 2002. He was relieved of his duties only a few weeks after the acquisition. We would appreciate a clarification in your publication.

Also, FYI, Diebold had systems in only 2 counties in Ohio on election day -- Lucas (which went to Sen. Kerry by a wide margin) and Hardin (a very small jurisdiction in NW Ohio). Both used paper-based optical scan systems. Elsewhere in the country, our touchscreen systems were used predominantly, and with positive feedback from both voters and election officials, in Georgia, Maryland, California (Alameda County), Texas and Kansas. None of which were swing states.

Mike Jacobsen
Diebold, Incorporated
Director, Global Communications
www.diebold.com

© Copyright 2004 by YubaNet.com
Send your letters to the editor to news@yubanet.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it me, or are alot them on the defense? Yang, Diebod, ?
Love this part,

"Diebold doesn't employ any convicted felons as developers."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Re: Quote You Posted
they just support felon's, ie murderer in chief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "doesn't employ any convicted felons as developers"
IOW, we employ them in other capacities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IAMREALITY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ""doesn't employ any convicted felons as developers""
"Instead we employ them ONLY as Election Day Technicians. Please make this clarification in your column immediately. We at Diebold appreciate if you get your facts straight."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. They don't say that after GES was bought...
... by Diebold, Jeffrey Dean went to work for one of their contractors....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Any moment now
we ought to be hearing from Mr. Feeney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stella2cat Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. notice he's quick to point out that they were only used
in 2 counties!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh the irony!!!!!
Diebold wants clarification. Bwahahahaha! :nopity:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's always a first time for everything, even exposing fraud. Even
if you don't have a criminal can sometimes mean you haven't gotten caught yet!!! What a lame-o!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was under the impression
That California filed suit agains Diebold after they failed to certify their machines properly, keeping those machines out of California. I'm not sure whether this meant ALL Diebold models, or just a particular one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC