I was looking for information on electronic voting in my state and came across this. I tried to search DU to see if there are any references to it. Found none so if it has already been rehashed, I apologize.
Analysis of an Electronic Voting Systemsnip
"Diebold claims that we are not very familiar with the election processes. However, we have extensive academic and industrial experience in software engineering, computer security, and cryptography, which forms the bases of our analysis. In this response, we show that Diebold's arguments often miss the point, do not address many of our most serious findings, and demonstrate a considerable lack of knowledge of the technical matter, including a misunderstanding of technical terms such as "safe language," as we describe below.
Also, Diebold criticized our network-based attacks as being unrealistic since the voting machines will not be networked in practice. The Diebold code we examined contains many different configuration options, including the use of wired or wireless networks and the use of modems. Any communication, whether wired or wireless, whether over the Internet or over private phone lines, is fair game for an analysis of what can be intercepted by an intruder. If there is no such communication, only then would the Diebold system be safe against such attacks. Our paper carefully stated these assumptions, while Diebold's response blurs this distinction."
Once again sorry if its old news. I haven't been here long and I'm trying to catch up and help if I can.