Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now I am TOTALLY Bummed. Jon Stewert and Tom Wolfe think ** WON!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:13 PM
Original message
Now I am TOTALLY Bummed. Jon Stewert and Tom Wolfe think ** WON!!!
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 06:05 PM by leftchick
I just perused my new issue of RollingStone magazine and there is a lenghthy article about the campaign wrap-up. Jon Stewert, Tom Wolfe and Al Franken are all quoted with their summeries of what the Democrats did wrong!!! Like idiotface* actually won a clean electoral victory! Even Davis Rees of the "Get Your War On" cartoon says... "Sure enough, Americans voted overwhelmingly to defeat John Kerry". ROLLINGSTONE!!! AAAArrrggghhhh!

Edit to add link Thanks to SueZhope!: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/6635609?pageid=rs.Politics&pageregion=single1&rnd=1102892505592&has-player=true&version=6.0.8.1024

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder when these comments
were actually made. There's a big delay in publication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SueZhope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, they did not discredit fraud investigations,
but I think it is clear that the election was very close with or without fraud....However, it should not have been close....it should have been at least 60-40 in favor of Kerry....I mean with that bonehead in chief, it should have been too easy to win, and yet it was not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I disagree
Because of the war, and the incumbency, this was a hard election to win. True, Bush, Rumsfeld, and all have been incompetent, but they are the "devil you know" and insecure people will stay with them rather than vote for the new guy, especially after the media beating John Kerry was given. I mean, they could have made anyone look bad. Anyone. So they made a good and decent candidate look like a fool to Mr. and Mrs. Average American, who tend to believe what they see on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And the Repubs here tend to think Bush is doing a good job
not everyone is as informed as they should be. That I was told by a Starbucks barista that her friend cried three times during the RNC because she was so touched by the 9/11 talk, that I was yelled at to get right with God when I was phonebanking, tells me people are more than alittle brainwashed.

It's time for a mass deprogramming. We have a cult of personality situation, I think. A "gee, we didn't know they were burning Jews just down the road," situation. Something as big as 9/11 may be needed to wake people out of their stupor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. So true.
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 05:51 PM by ginnyinWI
And it is very hard to get any contrary news through to the people. If Bush were found to be involved in anything equivalent to the Lewinsky scandal, do you think it would be picked up by the media? I suspect it would be dumped late on a Friday night, and he'd have any number of people out by Sunday morning offering cover for him, and trying to smear whoever brought forth the information. They have such a lock on the media, except for the Internet and a few print publications (The Nation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Since someone quashed the Daily Show forum, not sure Jon has real info any
Since someone quashed the Daily Show forum, not sure Jon has real info anymore. He might have to relie on the major media, which is his main source of ideas for his program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope one day to see a lot of apologies
saying on their front pages, "We were Wrong"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So if we you think we did everything right
How can we promote change to bring about electoral success in the future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mary195149 Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't believe
anyone actually believes that. They all say that though, probably to take the focus off of what is really going on. This should be the week we start seeing everything unfold to the real story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My gut tells me buscho won
Yes there was fraud, but I believe bush won. Should it be proved that he won fraudulently, I'll be more than happy to say I was wrong. In any case, it was close. I'm with Mencken re the stupidity of Americans. I could give a shit if anyone thinks that's elitest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdog Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. any link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. no link for current issues...
sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SueZhope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. This is the article correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes Indeed! Thank you SO MUCH!
I thought they delayed their online articles until after the issue was off the news stand! Here is the part that stuck in my craw....

~snip~
What actually happened was that some of the people who voted for Gore in 2000 this time voted for the other guy. This time Bush got fifty-one percent of the vote -- and it wasn't all crazy people. Nevertheless, you had the press two days before the election saying that college kids were coming out in record numbers and cell-phone users were going to make polling obsolete. So the one truism that emerges from all of this is that there continues to be zero accountability in the press. There is not a profession in the world where you can be that wrong, that consistently, and still continue to practice your job with greater job security than before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatieB Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps we'll have to wait for these folks to get some guts when
the day comes that we all have to move to China for jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rolling Stone has always been a suckup rag...
...ever since they sided with John Lennon against Paul McCartney. Idiots!

Take it with a grain of salt. A LOT OF PEOPLE don't know what happened, and are only just finding out (just like the facts about Iraq WMDs).

DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Email Jon Stewart a quick summary of the election fraud evidence so far (it's overwhelming, really!). He's a smart guy--he'll love the stuff about WHO OWNS the SECRET source code for all the electronic vote tabulators in the country, and the Berkely, Freeman, TruthIsAll, ignatizmouse and others' analyses of what they did with it.

Franken--I don't know. He often seems like a shill for the Democratic leadership (who so *ed up on letting rightwing Republicans get control of our voting system). I find him about as inspiring as Terry McAuliffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. i think they all agree that 19 'waiters hijacked 4 jets simultaneously too
jann wenner at the RS went over to the busheviks long time ago....i remember Hunter thompson calling him a goof...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEAVYHEART Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. People...
I can't believe this shit. Those of you on this thread talking about why Bush won and that it was a close election are drinking the fucking cool aid! Wake the fuck up people! The election was stolen!:thumbsdown: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdog Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Excuse me??
Sorry Jon Stewart, you’re wrong. J

Al Franken - I’m sure will be glad to apologize for being wrong when we prove it’s President KERRY not Bush.

Tom Wolfe - When did he write this? I’m sure many facts have come out since he wrote this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ironic, since without Franken, Kerry would have dropped out in
December, 2003 and Clark or Edwards would have been the nominee.

"The decision was between a guy who was resolute but wrong and a guy who was not as resolute-seeming but kind of right."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigonation Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Don't be bummed...
It's always good to have a variety of opinions, and these guys in the mainstream public eye have to sound sane and reasonable to keep their public audiences. There is no crime in that because they usually articulate our values. We are still missing rock-solid evidence of fraud, (not voter suppression) but once the pieces begin to fit together, perhaps they'll jump on board and be some of the strongest voices to reach out to the general public. I'm anxious to hear what Cliff Arnebach is releasing tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bones_7672 Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. So does 99% of the American public. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. actually at least 20%
do not think it was won "fair and square" if you believe polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepper32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. This was written when???
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 06:37 PM by Pepper32
A few weeks ago. Well this story is progressing every few hours! So, I doubt any of them can NOW say * won, with a straight face.

Bush has NO mandate. Just ask Kathrine Blackwell. Oh wait, he is too busy covering up their fraud.

Edited: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC