BREAKING UPDATE!: CLINT CURTIS 'STUNS' JUDICIARY COMM HEARINGS IN OHIO WI

[Brundle_Fly]

BREAKING UPDATE!: CLINT CURTIS 'STUNS' JUDICIARY COMM HEARINGS IN OHIO WITH 'JAW DROPPING' SWORN TESTIMONY!

Testimony described as 'Show Stopper', 'Stunner', 'Jaws Dropped'!
Audible 'Gasps' heard in chamber room!

thanks brad!

http://bradblogtoo.blogspot.com/

[tjdee]

1. Audible gasps.... where did this guy Brad come from??

If this is legit, this rocks.

But where did this Brad guy come from? (Kind of late in the game for that question, LOL) Out of nowhere this guy comes with the Curtis story (also from nowhere)...

Hmm. But again--if true, and if this leads anywhere in the Republican controlled Congress, AAAAAAAWWWWWEEESOOOMMMMEEEE!

[Brundle_Fly]

3. Brad is legit.

been through this before

[quiet.american]

5. Brad's familiar to DU'ers

His breaking of the Curtis Clinton saga was all over here last week.

[tjdee]

8. Yeah, I know...I meant, before that.

His site lists him as a software guy, and an "investigative blogger"... he might as well be me or you.....just was wondering if anyone knows anything about this guy, how he's got access to Curtis, etc.

Not necessarily being a doubting Thomas, just curious.

[quiet.american]

20. Ah --

Well, I've seen an FAQ-type thread he posted on here where he pretty much addresses the subject.

Thread hopefully is still accessible through the Search box.

[tjdee]

38. Thank you...

:)

[quiet.american]

49. :) n/t

[HR_Pufnstuf]

21. Updated w/ details

The BRAD BLOG has just received an exclusive first-hand account of Clint Curtis' sworn testimony (as reported earlier) to the Judiciary Committee Democrats holding hearings this morning in Columbus, Ohio on Election 2004 Voting Irregularities.

Curtis was the only witness to be sworn in at today's hearings. Here is the exclusive account as we've just received it by a very reliable BRAD BLOG source inside the committee hearings!


The following account may sound melodramatic but it is highly accurate.

None of these are quotes and represent my best recollection.

At apprx 1p, after a witness had finished, cliff arnebeck -- who had given a presentation some time before -- interjected and asked to call one more witness. He was given permission to do so. He said he was calling clint curtis.

Some of the audience literally gasped while others applauded. They clearly knew who he was.


READ FULL:
http://bradblogtoo.blogspot.com/

[delphine]

64. Gawd, I hope this isn't the vote fraud version of the Killian memos (nt)

[genieroze]

2. ????

nothing there.

[quiet.american]

4. "Details Momentarily." n/t

[joanski01]

6. I went to the website, too

and nothing was there??????

[IAMREALITY]

7. Very Very Cool. eom

[NJCher]

9. hey, it is jaw dropping

I recall when I first read about it here, too. My jaw dropped. I audibly gasped.


Cher

[texpatriot2004]

10. Brad has been covering this issue since 11/03/04 n/t

[pbartch]

11. GREAT Blog. Thanks Brad for helping provide TRUTHFUL

information about this lousy, fraudulent election.

[Broken Acorn]

12. What's up with the police sirens on their website?

Is that foreshadowing of Katherine Blackwell's car chase with Ohio State Troopers?

[tjdee]

13. Reminds me of mediawhoresonline....

Whenever they had a big story, they put up the sirens.

I think Matt "I'm stupid" Drudge has something similar.

They just mean "LOOKIE!".

[Razorback_Democrat]

14. Reminds me of Drudge w/ the police lights

but the blog is good

Thanks Brad

[insane_cratic_gal]

18. it's all

of the testimony that was given from the guy from Yang enteriprises?

The one who wrote the program back in 2000.

Do we know how relevant this guy is? They have already been trying to dismiss his testimony as hogwash for being fired from the company.?

[BlueDog2u]

41. That story is laughable....read the full reports at the Bradblog/eom

[pacalo]

78. When you consider that Curtis testified about Feeney's election fraud

in front of a judiciary committee (on which Feeney is also a member), it's hard to question his credibility. I don't think this has anything to do with animosity in regard to being fired from his company.

And I'm not surprised that the Repugs are busily looking for a way to dismiss his testimony. They don't have the capacity to understand that there are some people who simply want to do the right thing. Curtis has been trying to get this story out since 2000 but -- sooprise, sooprise -- no one would listen.

What Clint Curtis did today took a lot of courage: He testified under oath to Democratic members of the judiciary committee about one of their Republican colleagues!

[kuozzman]

This site has some good links about todays developments...

http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_14464.shtml

[L. Coyote]

57. More links at Election Fraud Links

Election Fraud Links

[rockedthevoteinMA]

15. Details posted now! n/t

[tjdee]

16. It's up, basically the big news is that he told on Feeney.

They asked him to repeat WHO told him to develop the prototype, that's when they were all shocked and stuff.

[Griffy]

74. UNDER OATH!!! at Ohio supreme court!!! nt

[genieroze]

17. There it is! KICK!!!!!!

[RaulVB]

19. Kick

[idiosyncratic]

22. Could someone post some of the text?

For some reason, the site will not load so I can't read it for myself.


Thanks . . .

[Brundle_Fly]

23. here it is

The BRAD BLOG has just received an exclusive first-hand account of Clint Curtis' sworn testimony (as reported earlier) to the Judiciary Committee Democrats holding hearings this morning in Columbus, Ohio on Election 2004 Voting Irregularities.

Curtis was the only witness to be sworn in at today's hearings. Here is the exclusive account as we've just received it by a very reliable BRAD BLOG source inside the committee hearings!

The following account may sound melodramatic but it is highly accurate.

None of these are quotes and represent my best recollection.

At apprx 1p, after a witness had finished, cliff arnebeck -- who had given a presentation some time before -- interjected and asked to call one more witness. He was given permission to do so. He said he was calling clint curtis.

Some of the audience literally gasped while others applauded. They clearly knew who he was.

Curtis stood at the front of room with arnebeck seated behind him. Curtis was about five to ten feet from the members of congress. At the front of the room, he placed his hand on a bible and was sworn. To my knowledge, he was the only witness sworn.

Arnebeck began a direct examination of curtis with basic questions, name, residence....

Then got to his qualifications.

Then, he asked curtis something like whether voting machines could be hacked. He said yes. Arnebeck asked him on what he based that opinion. He said because I wrote a program that could do it. Arnebeck asked when that happened. Curtis said feeney had asked him to design such a program at yang enterprises.

Jaws dropped. Tubbs jones and waters looked shocked.

Tubbs jones, waters and nadler asked questions. Waters asked him to repeat who asked him to do it. Congressman feeney, he said. Nadler asked him some questions, as did tubbs jones and a state senator.

Curtis was asked what he would conclude if there was such a substantial deviation btwn exit polls and actual results. He said he would conclude the election had been hacked. Gasps. Could have heard a pin drop.

In the end, curtis was very very convincing to everyone in attendance. He was a show stopper, a stunner. It was a really amazing moment.

[idiosyncratic]

24. Sorry . . . dupe. Self-deleted . . .

[Brundle_Fly]

26. and again

The BRAD BLOG has just received an exclusive first-hand account of Clint Curtis' sworn testimony (as reported earlier) to the Judiciary Committee Democrats holding hearings this morning in Columbus, Ohio on Election 2004 Voting Irregularities.

Curtis was the only witness to be sworn in at today's hearings. Here is the exclusive account as we've just received it by a very reliable BRAD BLOG source inside the committee hearings!

The following account may sound melodramatic but it is highly accurate.

None of these are quotes and represent my best recollection.

At apprx 1p, after a witness had finished, cliff arnebeck -- who had given a presentation some time before -- interjected and asked to call one more witness. He was given permission to do so. He said he was calling clint curtis.

Some of the audience literally gasped while others applauded. They clearly knew who he was.

Curtis stood at the front of room with arnebeck seated behind him. Curtis was about five to ten feet from the members of congress. At the front of the room, he placed his hand on a bible and was sworn. To my knowledge, he was the only witness sworn.

Arnebeck began a direct examination of curtis with basic questions, name, residence....

Then got to his qualifications.

Then, he asked curtis something like whether voting machines could be hacked. He said yes. Arnebeck asked him on what he based that opinion. He said because I wrote a program that could do it. Arnebeck asked when that happened. Curtis said feeney had asked him to design such a program at yang enterprises.

Jaws dropped. Tubbs jones and waters looked shocked.

Tubbs jones, waters and nadler asked questions. Waters asked him to repeat who asked him to do it. Congressman feeney, he said. Nadler asked him some questions, as did tubbs jones and a state senator.

Curtis was asked what he would conclude if there was such a substantial deviation btwn exit polls and actual results. He said he would conclude the election had been hacked. Gasps. Could have heard a pin drop.

In the end, curtis was very very convincing to everyone in attendance. He was a show stopper, a stunner. It was a really amazing moment.

[Vinnie From Indy]

31. "literally gasped"

That must have been something. The figurative gasps are not nearly so entertaining.

[Straight Shooter]

56. LOL.

You are cruel :spank:

[SeattleRob]

25. I have mixed feelings about this

If he is legit, this is a good thing. If he's not - it could discredit
all the hard work that so many good people have been doing. I hope he's the real deal.

[Brundle_Fly]

27. the legitimacy

will be decided by the pundits.

do not try to choose, over what we tell you.

thank

the MSM

[quiet.american]

28. Well -- He was under oath

We'll see what happens now.

[insane_cratic_gal]

29. I hear ya

I was just saying that in another post.

I read some place that freepers dismissed him for being fired or something? That is why he's coming forward?


Makes me very leery..

[Guarionex]

30. bradblog

discounted all "he's a disgrunted employee" accusations by proving that he was missed by his employees and often contacted under friendly relations by former employees....he's not disgruntedl...

[Brundle_Fly]

32. he even was given a going away party.

he did expose a few other frauds the company was doing against people in florida....after he left...

I think that is called a conscience.

[GetTheRightVote]

39. I met Clint Curtis and spoke with him for some time

at the hearing last Wednesday that Rep. John Conyers gave and recorded by C-Span, it was great to meet all the great people who are dealing with the fraud on our behalfs, wonderful people, simply wonderful. Even then he seemed to be on the up and up on this whole deal, I shook his hand and thanked him for bringing the truth to the light for all to see, he is great.

[truehawk]

60. I think he has had a really hard time being heard. n/t

[buzzard]

59. That is what I would call it as well.

[rockedthevoteinMA]

33. They (Yang) supposedly held some huge going away

party for him - and kept him on an extra six weeks, when the person who was supposed to take his place quit the same day they started.

[impeachthescoundrel]

34. He was not fired

He resigned, and ended up staying longer than he wanted because his replacement quit the first day.

[quiet.american]

35. The Kool-Aid version

As usual, the Kool-Aid drinkers have run with their own version of events rather than the full circumstances.

As I understand it, documentation backs up Curtis's claim he resigned, and then stayed on six more weeks at the company's request until they were able to find a replacement for him. Doesn't exactly add up to "fired."

(Wow, you guys above me are fast!) :)

[insane_cratic_gal]

42. So he's legit?

He has verifiable proof that they used this program .. that is the reason for them wanting to examine the e-voting machines?

I'm guessing at this point, I just don't want any freeper to be able to come along and dismiss him so easily. I want him to be the nail in the coffin.

[quiet.american]

48. Me,too

The conclusion leans towards his story being legit in that heretofore it has not been disproved, was met with a very terse non-denial denial by YEI, and apparently is considered credible enough for Arnebeck to bring it forth very dramatically into the public arena, where Curtis, unlike Dr. Rice, or any Bushco official, was willing to testify to it under oath.

[troubleinwinter]

53. He did not say that he had "verifiable proof that they used...

this program", as you state.

He said that Feeney asked him to develop the program, and Curtis made it and gave it to Yang to give to Feeney.

[quiet.american]

36. Dupe

[pacalo]

79. You feel leery because freepers dismissed him? Hmmm.

[genieroze]

37. This is SWEET! eom

[mdb]

40. May I remind you your under oath!! Yee-haa baby!!

[SheepyMcSheepster]

43. interesting, thanks for the update

[Vinnie From Indy]

44. What About The Dog Whacking?

Was there any mention of the mafia like hit on his dog?

As I understand the other threads, his dog was whacked as a warning that he was talking too much. I hope he had security personnel with him to protect himself and his famous 'affidavit'. Man! His story would make an excellent book!

[ColoradoDemocrat]

67. Dog whacked!

We're dog people-that hurts! My husband the redneck laughed tho--"isn't that pretty old-fashioned?"

[insane_cratic_gal]

45. One more thing

Isn't this the same guy, that had a sworn certified, it was scanned and placed for viewing. Notarized statment or something or another. One Du'er pointed out he signed his name wrong?

Gosh I have to go hunting for that thread now

[troubleinwinter]

54. No, he had not "signed his name wrong"

The name "Clint" was typed at the bottom of the sworn affidavit, and he struck it out, signed "Clinton" and initialed the correction.

Much like one might stike out "Mike" and correct it to Michael.

Maybe you should stop worrying about people trying to discredit him, huh?

[pacalo]

80. He didn't sign his name wrong. He drew a line through the

typed, shortened version of his first name on the affidavit; then printed his "official" first name. There was nothing wrong with his signature. Put another quarter in & try again. ;)

[in_cog_ni_to]

46. We knew about this. Why don't our Congress people know about it?

I am THRILLED that Curtis testified, but just can't believe "I", little ole me, knows more about this shit than they do. Man, I sure hope C-SPAN airs this!

[McCamy Taylor]

47. too bad US wont see it cause CSPAN buckled to political pressure

[Quakerfriend]

51. I was wondering what happened!!

Does anybody know, is it being taped?

[Griffy]

75. instead.. It goes to feed the cover-up, which will burst on them..

someday.. i hope before January 6th... Be in DC on that day!

[bush_is_wacko]

50. I'm taking a wait and see attitude on this!

I know many of you are saying this guy is legit, but lets face it, there have been many legitimate news stories buried for months now!

[lonestarnot]

52. Just don't know what to think. I want to SEE him to judge credibility!

[SeattleRob]

55. I agree with your stance

I really want him to be legit, I hope he is. I am more cautious, especially after what happened to Dan Rather.

[anamandujano]

58. now the ball's in Feeney's court

he'll have to rumage up a statement which will, no doubt, be laced with traceable lies.

[Quakerfriend]

61. So far, so good

As much as I admire Mr. Curtis' bravery and patriotism, I too am a tiny bit nervous. I remember reading that he wrote the prototype for the actual program to be used. Is this the program actually used? I don't think we know that yet.

[insane_cratic_gal]

62. It makes sense in this regard

Kerry's letter called for an independent over look of the voting machines. Scanners and E vote did it not?

That suggests to me that is exactly what they are looking for, hints or suggestions of the program.

[Scout1071]

63. That is great news

I would enjoy it much more if I weren't so pissed off that they didn't air the hearings today.

[Carl Brennan]

65. NOW!!! If one more person testifies. Just one

who knows something damning. That would be very, very good.

[teddyk23]

66. ask and ye shall receive

There is at least one more person coming......

[IndyPriest]

71. Teddy: what's the deal?

Come on, if you can't say everything you know, at least say how you know what you know!

[teddyk23]

73. read this esp last para

http://what-we-know.blogspot.com/2004/12/wheels-are-coming-off-in-ohio.html

[teddyk23]

76. now read the just posted bradblog...

Now you know some more

[ntwkgirl]

68. CONYERS HEARING ON RADIO LEFT NOW!!!

http://blog.radioleft.com/blog/_archives/2004/12/13/204073.html

[seito]

69. Thanks for posting this n/t

[Smirking_Chimp]

70. Feeney's the guy...

..we have to make his life hell from this point onward. 'Splain Lucy!!!

[John Q. Citizen]

72. This is at least as good entertainment as "The Swift Boats"

and I can't wait for the Nightline investigation into whether it pans out.

We should ask Ted Koppel to have him on Night Line and see if Clint Curtiss stands up to the "Central Scrutinizer."

[understandinglife]

77. BradBlogToo posts video links to Curtis....

....sworn testimony.

http://bradblogtoo.blogspot.com/

Peace.

"When Did Bush Know?"

[understandinglife]

82. Igantz posts transcript at dKos

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2004/12/13/18416/541/77#77

Peace.

"When Did Bush Know?"

[For PaisAn]

81. Here's an interview with Clinton Curtis

http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=479

Very interesting read. He explains his reasons for coming forward and issues a warning to all Democrats to fix this now if they ever want to win another election. It appears that this guy feels he is in danger but that this is too important to keep silent about. Another Florida investigator investigating Cutis's charges was found dead, in what was ruled a suicide. Hmmm....

[toandme]

83. WOW!

[whirlygigspin]

85. they need to get the FBI in on this

[For PaisAn]

86. Yes

I think it's time for that.

[For PaisAn]

84. I'm donating to the Cobb recount fund right now

Already donated twice but I'm sending them more. They are our only hope now, not the Democrats sorry to say.