Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Dissident" still being pushed...remember: THEY CONTROL DEBATE/OPPOSITION

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:44 AM
Original message
"Dissident" still being pushed...remember: THEY CONTROL DEBATE/OPPOSITION
...THROUGH LANGUAGE. They beat us every time through the message, and this is how.

We still need to nip "dissident" in the bud.

Several great threads covered this over the last couple of days (links at bottom). Letters were written. Editors seemed to comply...but today it's back again.
December 14, 2004

Court asked to review Ohio vote

Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio - The Ohio delegation to the Electoral College cast its votes for President Bush on Monday, hours after dissident groups asked the state Supreme Court to review the outcome of the state's presidential race.


http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?tl=1&display=rednews/2004/12/14/build/nation/60-ohio-vote.inc

to reemphasize...

As has been noted,dissident's sudden appearance the other night(can anyone find the first use?) wasn't an accident. It strikes the ear a little funny for a reason -- it characterizes us in a way that's just not right...marginalizing us, coloring and blurring our motivations, purpose, etc.

Some might not mind the term; may even thrill at it...being placed in the tradition of Andrei Sakharov, Noam Chomsky, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and Nelson Mandela, as the linked article below mentions. But we really have to be aware of the heavy minority, minority, weak, lone voice connotation this word implies. Romantic and rebellious, sure, but it comes with a huge downside. Be aware of the "frame" this creates if we let this pass. More middle-of-the-road readers are going to be willing to sympathize/identify with the concerns of a "challenger" than a dissident.

From Wikipedia.

A dissident is a person that actively opposes the established order. The term is most often used to refer to political dissidents, usually against oppressive regimes. Political dissidents usually refer to non-violent means, which can range from voicing criticism of the government to attempts to displace or overthrow the established government by achieving popular support and sparking a revolution. In totalitarian regimes these dissidents are often punished with lengthy prison sentences or execution. Similarly, social dissidents openly oppose accepted social attitudes. In democratic societies political and social dissidents are supposed to be free from government pressure, but there have been noted instances of persecution, such as the witch hunts in the United States for communists in the 1950s.

Who was the first reporter to use this term? I think he should be challenged as to why. To be a dissident has more of a "lifestyle" connotation of just dissenting...an antiestablishment way of life, and NOT regular citizens roused to anger and protest because of a particular offense. As mentioned before, it's asssociated with foreigners, etc...ever-dissenting French. In other words, Rush would/does(?) use the term, and you know exactly why. Would the writer ever have used "dissent" to describe one of the anti-clinton conservative a groups? We've all been on the lookout for what Roves first move would be in relation to the fraud allegations -- this is it.
link:
http://www.yourencyclopedia.net/data1/en/wikipedia/d/di/dissident.html

previous threads:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x150243
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=145341&mesg_id=145341



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I posted on this earlier. While its been corrected, many already had earli
er version. It had already been sent. I'm okay with challengers. Not okay with dissidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Next, we'll be called "insurgents."
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who is the owner/CEO at AP? WE should start there.
Also calls to the AP executive offices, if someone can find a number.

Are any other media outlets originating stories with the term dissident, or are they all just republishing AP wire stories?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old blue Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. When you find out who runs AP, it will make sense
I can't remember where I read it recently (probably here), but the man pulling the strings at AP is a verifiable Bushie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoWantsToBeOccupied Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Any Beverly Kees connection?
One of the respected journalists who died Friday, Beverly Kees, "had also served for the Associated Press Managing Editors Association as committee chair, board member and secretary." Kees was killed by a truck, apparently while in a crosswalk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think your second DU thread
...the one with the article by AP reporter John McCarthy (aptly named) was the first we ran across the 'dissident' thing. And yes you're right, this manipulation mustn't be allowed to stand. We need to stay on top of it and send each reporter and editor that transgresses by using this word a little love note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. it's like reading "pravda" nowadays
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stirringstill Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dissident is fine with me
One thinks of Vaclav Havel. I don't mind dissident as a label. It sounds more noble than protester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Alexander Dubcek and Prague Spring. Doesn't bother me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
35. No, it is not fine.
They are trying to besmirch millions of patriotic American citizens who are outraged over what is SURELY disenfranchisement of the vote--was even WIDELY ANTICIPATED in various and sundry print and broadcast media stories about e-voting and actual plans by the Justice Department's "Voting Section" to allege fraud and thereby intimidiate and suppress the vote. We do not need to be characterized as doing anything more than demanding that voting rights and laws be upheld in this country. That is NOT dissidence. That is patriotism. Letting them classify us in such a politically volatile way is both dangerous to us and dangerous to what we are trying to achieve. Write and demand retractions. Don't let it slide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. If they're trying to besmirch, they're doing a crappy job of it...
And the way you KEEP them at doing a crappy job of it is to take the OWNERSHIP OF THE WORD AWAY FROM THEM.

If they own it, it's a LABEL.
If we own it, it's a TITLE.

I choose to keep them from owning that word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verdalaven Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Even AAR
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 05:55 AM by verdalaven
called us "dissidents". After having written a letter of complaint to CNN for using that term, no more than ten minutes afterwards, a news announcer on AAR (reading a script)called us dissidents. So it isn't just corporate news sources.

And yes, I wrote AAR a little note voicing my shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNY Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. welcome to 1984
It was only 20 years off. Have you seen the tenth edition
of the Newspeak Dictionary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. I prefer
concerned citizen....
Mojorabbit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Fancy Pants Language to the rescue!
....Fix that right up here...dont worry, be hAPpY

http://www.news-miner.com/Stories/0,1413,113~7252~2594726,00.html

KICK THEIR LOVIN ASS, FANCY PANTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimmyBoy Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. 130,656
<quote>
Without listing specific evidence, the complaint alleges 130,656 votes for Kerry and John Edwards in 36 counties were somehow switched to count for the Bush-Cheney ticket.
</quote>

Anyone know where he gets this number?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hi TimmyBoy!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Found in today's papers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. another...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe we should embrace "dissident"
Call ourselves dissidents

make the word sound GOOD to people

dissidents are those that want justice served and illegal regimes removed!

We supported dissidents in Iraq and in Iran

Dissidents are COOL!

get the word out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. Solzhenitzyn, Havel, Mandela
all dissidents, all considered way cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. To be placed on the wall, above my desk today....
I am not a Dissident!
I am a PATRIOT!
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Will They Be Calling Us INSURGENTS in the Future ?
It's not necessarily an insult in the fascist Bushitler regime...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. the Future? Coulter and others call us "traitors" now!
I'm sure insurgents is already there as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. American revolutionaries were "INSURGENTS" to King George....
It's not necessarily an insult, like "traitor", although the colonists were actually "traitors" to Great Britain at the time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. big difference if the AP started calling us "Traitors" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. It's only a matter of time with the way things are headed in our country
dissidents, traitors, etc.

We have to get these bozos out of office

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. structure in place to track DISSIDENTS (ohio)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. i am a dissident. BUSH CHEATED
that alone qualifies me as a dissident. publically or violently dissenting

bush cheated.............publically dissenting.

what can i say, wait until i tell all i meet today, that the media says i am a dissident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. Good, we should embrace the word and MOCK them
Make it a joke and call ourselves dissidents. That will take the sting away. "Hi, I'm Cheswick. Right wing media would call me a dissident."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. Dissident is a big step up from conspiracist or tinfoil-hatter n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Those asking for fair elections are "dissidents"
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 12:41 PM by Angry Girl
But what does it mean to be called a dissident? As per Wikipeda at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissident:

A dissident is a person that actively opposes the established order. The term is most often used to refer to political dissidents, usually against authoritarian regimes.

Hmmm, perhaps CNN et al. were indeed on the money!

We can only wonder now, however, when the next shoe will drop. For the act of labeling honest, concerned American citizens people as dissidents and dissident groups only sets up the truth seekers to be muzzled by the totalitarian tools that are the Patriot Acts.

Full text at
http://angrygirl.blogspirit.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. heh, heh, heh...here's an idea:
Write and thank AP for exposing the truth about Bush's regime. If we're "dissidents," his administration must be totalitarian--after all, wikipedia says so! ;-) Better yet, DU should issue a press release announcing AP's new terminology and its implications for our new system of government in America. We cc every media outlet, and forward it with a cover letter to AP.

I'll bet they'd drop that word lickety-split!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. They define themselves as totalitarians when they call us dissidents
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 12:42 PM by pat_k
Write to the "journalists" using the term with this speculation:

Do you have any predictions about how long it will be before the regime starts putting the dissidents that are fighting for the principle consent into jail?

Opps. Sorry. Already started. (The couple trying to deliver Conyers' letter to Blackwell.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
33. Some Famous Dissidents
Jesus Christ
George Washington
Ben Franklin
Thomas Jefferson
Sam Adams
Mahatma Gandhi
Martin Luther King Jr

and many more

And don't forget...

The U.S. gov't (many of the same people in the current administration) liked Sadam Hussein when he was a dissident... we gave him lots of money and weapons (including WMDs) to overthrow the Iraqi government and install a military dictatorship.

The U.S. gov't (many of the same people in the current administration) liked Osama Bin Laden when he was a dissident in Afgahanistan fighting the USSR... we gave him lots of money and weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. NIP IT IN THE BUD BY EMBRACING THE WORD. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. I love being a dissident
I've been one for about 40 years now. Besides, remember that old saying about sticks and stones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. Anyone who embraces a LABEL
by a fascist group is an IDIOT, not a dissident.

STOP IT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. absolute kick for that!

The right just TRASHED US because we were laid back on connotation....

I keep thinking about Hannity tonight, spew out memmes ot our Dear Arnebeck...You lost, get over it...

We can play this game.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. I'm taking back LIBERAL, and I WON'T let them have DISSIDENT.
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 03:10 AM by chalky
Sorry if that offends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
41. Labeling a step in apartied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
42. My letter to the AP
A dissident's perspective


I find it odd that you have labeled the people who are concerned about the possibility of fraud in the 2004 election as dissidents. My understanding of the term defines us as people who are going against an established order. This is what you are suggesting. We are simply concerned with exposing a crime. In spite of all of the evidence of election fraud, you call us dissidents. What’s next? When we hold up a sign in protest, will we be called insurgents and, should we resist when they try and force us off the streets, our streets, will you then label us as terrorists?



You guys are something else. Where is your honor? Where is the integrity that the journalists are supposed to have? You guys are actively participating in propaganda. You fuck with public perception to suit the goals of a government. How can you even call yourselves journalists? You should be ashamed. But I guess, this is an opinion of dissidence and since a dissident is a member of a radical group that goes against the established order, this time our democracy, my words are meaningless. But guess what, I am also a consumer and as the dissention grows and more and more people begin to listen to me and my ilk, I will never forget or forgive those companies that tried to profit from this scam on the people, and as a consumer, I will make sure that more and more people know how you tried to help the fraud and make sure people start consuming your product less. Here is my “dis” word for your company, disdain.



Sincerely,

Michael Lewis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC