New Yorker Article -- by Louis Menand

[neversaynever]

The Dec 6 issue of New Yorker also has an article that doesn't exactly SUPPORT the idea of election fraud, but doesn't entirely dismiss it eiither (cites Steve Freeman's study). I guess the piece is still predicated on the notion that an election actually occurred, but I find it refreshing that there is no trace of derision or dismissal of the possibility that election fraud occured (amazing how quickly the standard of expectation falls, eh?).

Haven't tried to google it or find it in the online version, but the title is

"Why Values Didn't Matter: On How Voters Really Decided"
by Louis Menand

[alexisfree]

1. thank you

I will look arround for it...

[neversaynever]

2. thanks, I didn't bother going to New Yorker online cause

I'm pretty sure you have to have a subscription, at least to access any full text.

As I said, the article's no "watershed" but at least not entirely dismissive.