Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's not the scandal. It's the cover-up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:07 PM
Original message
It's not the scandal. It's the cover-up.
Time and time again, this is how it goes down. Maybe we've been looking at this all wrong.

The recounts, while important and wholly worth pursuing in my book, may turn out to be a lost cause if they manage to fix the totals and 3% of precincts.

However, if we keep pressuring them to have to fix these things over and over again, they will keep making mistakes, like this Triad fuck-up that has garnered national attention.

We need to keep pressing for recounts, pressing for explanations, both in Ohio and elsewhere. Every time they are forced to defend this, they make mistakes that can be exploited.

Look at the Volusia mess. If that video ever surfaces, we can force people to take another look there. These things need to be followed up by people who are local.

The opti-scan ballots cannot be fraudulently re-filled in to match the totals. It would take a crew of people YEARS to replace these in the proper precincts. We need to call that bluff.

We need to keep pressuring them. They are on the defensive. The more pressure we put on, the more likely we will find out something that will make a judge rule for a FULL inspection of the ballots.

When that happens, we will have exposed the fraud. We will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the public understands things like "What is Blackwell hiding?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. BING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impeachthescoundrel Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think you are right
Remeber Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Right on! The more frauds monkey around the more chances to screw up
and its usually much less well planned out than the original deception, since its ad hoc by the seat of the pants. So more chances to nab them. That's why I'm not as worried about the actual count in the recount. I just figure it will smoke them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. You are on target with this one
We have got to keep the pressure on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. But it IS the scandal - my vote is more important than anything.
You want to spin it - muddle the truth like they do? Go ahead. The media will still ignore you and all you've done is trivializing voting, democracy.
I can only look at this one way: the democratic process in this country has been twarted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Perhaps I should rephrase: It is the cover-up that gets them caught.
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 01:20 PM by tasteblind
You are right. This is a strategy to get from a to b in this particular battle. What you are referring to is the long-term war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't see it as muddling the truth. Rather, as you go after...
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 01:37 PM by smartvoter
the truth and they try to hide it, they look guilty, which builds pressure and sentiment to get at the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why are US elections
the only accounting system in the world, that doesn't count the numbers twice?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. That's a brilliant take on it.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. exactly! and the more pressure we bear the more stupid things they do...
...so keep up the pressure and people like Katherine Blackwell will make Friday afternoon calls locking down the voting records when someone requests copies of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah. I think the actions people are taking are provoking mistakes.
I say keep it up. Someone is bound to crack or talk or screw-up royally, and then it will be a short distance to a Kiev-style showdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkusQ Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. His name is Ken, not Katherine

I know Bev suggested calling him "Katherine" but I think it is silly at best, and most likely counter productive. If we want people just joining this forum to understand what we are saying (and accept it) we should at the very least endeavor to call people and organizations by their right names. It makes googling for more info easier, it makes explaining it to strangers easier, and, after all, it is the truth we are after.

--MarkusQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. puts more pressure on him if we call him Katherine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepthemhonest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. maybe the machines come up with almost the exact some number
when they run them through again, or if not all are run through it is as a %. Am I stretching this one or what?Why do the counts so far seem to have not changed anything significantly.

I guess we will have to count on the fraud evidence and any leftover provisionals to save us on this one,because we can not seem to beat them at this game(on their field)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes. Apply pressure constantly, everywhere. Truth will out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Which law enforcement has jurisdiction, for the people in Ohio
recount to contact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I don't know, but the person that figures that out and presses charges
will get a gold star.

You'd think Conyers and Arnebeck would have found people with standing and grounds to do so by now.

Perhaps that recount failure yesterday will lead to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zapped 1 Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. kick! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent rationale (n/t)
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 02:46 AM by RaulVB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC