Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Distraction, distraction, distraction.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:59 PM
Original message
Distraction, distraction, distraction.
GWB & rovey & the lot are trying to distract the lawyers from their pursuit and investigation of the election irregularities. Smoke & mirrors boys and girls.
==============================================
Bush Wants New Congress to Limit Lawsuits

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush said on Wednesday he expects the new Congress to limit economy-damaging lawsuits by passing curbs on class action, asbestos injury and medical malpractice cases.

``I intend to take a legislative package to Congress which says, we expect the House and Senate to pass meaningful liability reform on asbestos, on class action, and medical liability,'' Bush told a White House economic conference.

The cost of litigation in America, Bush said, was making it more difficult to compete against other countries economically. Legal reform was a cornerstone of any good economic expansion program, he said.

``I am passionate on this subject,'' he said, adding that he would make it a ``priority issue,'' starting with his State of the Union address to Congress early next year.

http://www.nytimes.com (link at the LBN thread below, I am not registered.)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1076246

=============================

This news coverage and WH press for immediate adoption for tort reform legislation serves two purposes, it is an attempt to distract the lawyers involved in the efforts to prove election fraud and make them change their focus to lobbying against the legislation (e.g. "if you drop the election fraud pursuit, we won't support the legislation") and it gives a reason for the weed to whine to the public that they only reason those trial lawyers are trying to sue him over the election is because of his tort reform stance. :cry:

Distraction, distraction, distortion, attack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. PNAC
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 02:04 PM by knowbody0
people should stop bitching about being killed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Really, I mean, there are so many other things that are more
important, like Barney the dog's christmas adventures. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoomerSoonerOKU Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe
it is a distraction... But it's certainly not a surprise. He talked about this many times during the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No shit sherlock - but forcing it as the first issue for the new
congress to vote on in Jan., just after they are sworn in definitely reflects that he wants to distract his detractors.

Welcome to DU, but defense of the clown-n-chief is not welcome or appreciated. Just a little friendly advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoomerSoonerOKU Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Excuse me???
First off, I wasn't defending him at all... I don't have access to the full story, but what I can see it says nothing about him making it the first order of business (if he can even do that).

I was just pointing out it should be no surprise since he now believes he has the "political capital" to push the agenda he spoke of.

Thanks but no thanks for your "friendly" advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course, he would have to include asbestos
suits. Must be certain that D.Cheney gets off for the 10s of thousands of asbestos suits racked up by Haliburton! And naturally, he sold his stock at the high point, just before he released these documents.......even tho the law demands that these cases be reported as they occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Didn't think about the halliburton/asbestos suits, thanks for the
info! :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC