Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Moyers to Arneback: Your Fancy-Pants Legal Language :-D

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:39 PM
Original message
Justice Moyers to Arneback: Your Fancy-Pants Legal Language :-D
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 07:41 PM by cryingshame
We have the writer for the Nashua Advocate on DU! Here's a piece he just alerted us to... it's must read

http://www.nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/

News: Election 2004: Ohio Chief Justice to Arneback: Your Fancy-Pants Legal Language Taxes My Intellect, Please Rephrase Your Suit in Simple Language
By ADVOCATE STAFF

In an embarrassment to competent lawyers nationwide, the top Republican in Ohio's judicial branch, Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Moyer, has temporarily thrown out a contest of election filed by Alliance for Democracy attorney Clifford Arneback because the judge erroneously thought Attorney Arneback was contesting his own election to a fourth term as Chief Justice.

The contest of election alleges that John F. Kerry should have received more votes in Ohio than "official" tallies suggest, given that a little-known Democratic candidate for Chief Justice, C. Ellen Connally -- whom Moyer defeated on November 2nd, 2004, to keep his job as Chief Justice -- inexplicably received more votes than the well-funded, nationally-recognized Kerry in more than a dozen counties.

Competent lawyers reviewing the Alliance for Democracy lawsuit were aware that Attorney Arneback was citing the Moyer-Connally results as correct -- and Ohio's Bush-Kerry vote totals as incorrect.

Attorney Arneback is expected to re-file the suit shortly, using monosyllabic words and elementary, easily-digested sentence structures.

.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Addendum from the news editor
.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know those bushies like to keep it simple, real basic
"re-file using monosyllabic words and elementary, easily-digested sentence structures."

That's great! I love that. What a riot.

Keep it simple for stupid people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IAMREALITY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Holy Fuck That Is TOO GODDAMN FUNNY!
Let's See Them Post That Shit On Drudge! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. It's a joke isn't it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh where did you buy your law degree then?
That is so freakin sadly humorous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. L.M.A.O. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdb Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor O Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. If you read Arnebecks filing
He was asking the court to deduct 260,000 + votes to his opposition and instruct Blackwell to issue an election certificate declaring Connally the judgeship. With this in consideration, the Nashua Advocate fucked up. Though it was funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Regardless, Moyers Should've Recused Himself Then
either way, he messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Exactly...
Arnebeck's lawsuit challenged both the Prez and Chief Justice Moyer's elections on 11/2/04. Ohio law says that the Chief Justice is not supposed to preside over a case challenging his own election, and must not choose the judge who does so. The Governor is supposed to choose that judge. Yet Moyer went right ahead and made this ruling on a case in which he is a named defendant re: his own election.

He says, in the ruling, that's he's only ruling on the Prez part of the case (dismissing it out, "without prejudice"--meaning it can be refiled as a separate case), but the case he ruled on was ONE CASE when he ruled on it, and he is one of the defendants. And he still is--on the case he just ruled on.

I first thought this was hair-splitting. But I've now read the ruling three times, and I think he just plain broke Ohio law. How can he make rulings of any kind on his own case--particularly a ruling that could affect the outcome (separating it from the Prez case and their common set of facts)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe it was too much of a "challange" for the Honorable Thomas Moyer.
If you all know what I mean ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kralizec Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOL! That is funny. Poor guy thought he was going to fire himself. HA! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularjoe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. What was that talk about contesting 2 on purpose to force recusement?
I'm not sure recusement is a word, oh well. Now to the point. Earlier people were saying Arnebeck contested 2 elections in 1 to cause the Chief Justice to recuse himself from both elections. Was that just someone's imagination inventing a good reason for the apparent 2 contests when it is actually just 1 contest? I'm getting a little confused. Does anyone know of a website where Arnebeck's people make press releases so we can get a primary source talking about this?

regularjoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor O Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here is the language in the complaint asking the court to throw
out moyer and install Connally

2. Wherefore Contestors ask the Court to set a hearing as provided in R.C. §3515.10. Contestors further ask the Court to determine that the number of votes affected by the irregularities identified herein are sufficient to declare Ellen Connally the winner of the position of Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court for the term commencing on January 1, 2005, and that the certificates of election to Thomas Moyer be cancelled by operation of law as set forth in R.C. §3515.14, or, in the alternative, that such irregularities, errors, frauds, and mistakes make the results of the election so uncertain that the Court should order the results of the election be set aside pursuant to R.C. §3515.14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Request --
Dr. O,

Can you direct us at The Advocate to where you found that language? According to the copy of Moss v. Bush we have, that language does not appear. The document we have appears to be a complete document.

TNE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor O Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Here is the link
It was in 'Prayer For Relief" Item 2. Just above the signature block.

http://freepress.org/images/departments/Election_Contest.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thanks
Dr. O...BuzzFlash.com has the Motion for TRO, but not the official contest of election. We had not seen the official contest itself -- and are surprised that the Motion for TRO is so dramatically different from the contest. What The Advocate wrote regarding the content of the Motion for TRO was correct -- it was not correct regarding the contest of election, apparently, so we will retract the story pending further review.

Thank you for the correction.

The News Editor
The Nashua Advocate
http://www.nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Dear News Editor, Regardless Of The Incomplete Assessment...
IT was the best laugh I've had in months.

Will check your website again in the future for more intersting pieces.

It's an honor to have you post here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Request --
Dr. O,

Can you direct us at The Advocate to where you found that language? According to the copy of Moss v. Bush we have, that language does not appear. The document we have appears to be a complete document.

TNE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor O Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dupe
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 08:18 PM by Doctor O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. bush says lets be stupid
you read you are an elitist

that is just damn sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intelle Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is hilarious!
ROFLMAO!!:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Farmgirl Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well, maybe B*sh got one more vote...
Okay, so B*sh got ONE more vote...



:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Hysterical...He Must Be Using "Optical Scanning" !!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. I hope he is a Republican. Too embarassing... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. LMAO LMAO LMFAO !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisabtrucking Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. I just have to say HAAHAAHAAHAA, maybe six grade language
would be better. What a dumb ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. this writer got it wrong, Arnebeck was contesting 2 elections
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&ncid=703&e=2&u=/ap/20041216/ap_on_el_pr/ohio_vote

"Arnebeck said that while he believes he is permitted to contest two elections with a common set of facts, "we're going to go with the flow." Filing the challenge again on Friday would depend on gathering the voters' signatures again, he said. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. It doesn't matter, Moyers was still wrong not to recuse himself
it's an ethics violation...not that any Rethug cares about ethics anymore, but he could be reprimanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. thats a different question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I think this is right because
there were some counties in which Moyer got more votes than Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. There ought to be a law...
...that you can't HACK more than ONE election at a time! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thanks for the laugh out loud Bill Bored. That would definitely
cut the confusion way down. You know how liars can't seem to keep them all straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC