Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: "Florida elections agency didn't properly watch felon database"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 06:35 PM
Original message
Report: "Florida elections agency didn't properly watch felon database"
Edited on Wed Dec-22-04 06:37 PM by EMunster
DAVID ROYSE

Associated Press

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - The state Division of Elections failed to sufficiently oversee an outside company that created a database meant to check voter registration against lists of felons and dead people, but there wasn't any intent to disenfranchise anyone, an internal audit of the database found.

(snip)

But earlier this year Secretary of State Glenda Hood's office abandoned the project after acknowledging that 2,500 ex-felons were on the list even though their voting rights had been restored through the state's clemency process and that, due to a technical glitch, Hispanics were largely absent from the list of those recommended for potential purging. Hispanics often vote Republican in Florida, and some critics questioned whether there was intent to purge some felons, but not others.



more:
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/10248475.htm









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. No intent covers incompetence and thats the standard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, sure, no intent
why THEN even HAVE such a list? What a bunch of LIARS.

Furthermore, Hood dropped this under threat of a FOIA lawsuit from CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, Okay
It's those pesky technical glitches again. :puke:
Thanks for the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some might have believed 'no intent' the first time in 2000
But again? Nope. This was definitely the intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC