Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much more evidence does Kerry/Conyers/Arnebeck have.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:32 AM
Original message
How much more evidence does Kerry/Conyers/Arnebeck have.....
in comparison to what we have available to us and have discovered on our own?

Any thoughts?

Personally I think they're sitting on some facts that we just don't have yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
femme.democratique Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. There must be evidence that hasn't yet been made public.
Especially Arnebeck. He DID say he didn't want to tip his hand before he absolutely had to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boi1946 Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. These guys are not only taking on the present Establishment...
but they're risking their political futures, credibility, etc....
They wouldn't take these chances without good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. And he's been saying all along he's ABSOLUTELY sure Kerry won Ohio
He seems too logical and credible to make a statement like that unless he can definitely back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This is documentation for much of it- touchscreen fraud
Ohio http://northnet.org/alpage.htm Youngstown

Ohio, Florida, New Mexico http://flcv.com/fraudpat.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think they have the power to compell evidence and witnesses
which we do not. They also have Lexus Nexus and private detectives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Excuse my ignorance... Lexus Nexus? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Lexus Nexus is something lawyers pay big $$$$ for access to
Lexus Nexus predates the internet.

We Google, they Lexus Nexus. We only have stuff that is available on the internet, they have access to all court records, tons of databases and an amazing clipping service for all print media.

I think if you go to a college law library you might find a student to Lexus Nexus for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Machiavelli05 Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Lexis Nexis isnt that exclusive
Most Congressional staff have acccess to it. Plus students and you can also go to many libraries to use it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Right, only exclusive because of the price n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. They don't have subpoena power yet. That's the importance of
having the lawsuits - either Kerry's or Arnebeck's - accepted by a court. And that's why Kerry's filing is crucial. It's possible that a court could throw out Arnebeck's because although it's ABOUT Kerry, it was filed THROUGH the Green's and Libs. A court could say that because they don't have any hope of redress from wrong, the suit is not worth the trouble to the state. KERRY'S, however, ups the ante considerably. He DOES have hope of redress from wrong, and so the court is almost automatically required to grant him his complaint -- and WITH it all the rights of subpoena, discovery, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yep! Lovely Christmas present.... :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. This has a poetic ring to it
"Lexus Nexus and private detectives" were all around the house...

Not to make light but we could make a long story/ryhme out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yes...to the rhyme of "'Twas the Night Before Christmas"...
and all through the big White House
not a creature was stirring except Kkkarl Rove
with Election Night figures still dancing in his head...

When up on the roof there arose such a clatter
he ran to the window in his footie-pajamas...
where provision ballots showered the sky.

On Dancer, on Vixen, on Triad, on Ohio,
on Florida, on Kerik, on Abu-Garib and Rumsfield!

Yet the only thing 'flying' at this big White House
were the 10-gallon rumors Kkkarl-boy spun himself.

(please excuse, this is just a draft, folks...help me out...one line at a time...we can write this ensemble?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SueZhope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. rosebud57 I love the ring to that!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. Only if we survive a motion to dismiss.
The first huge hurdle will be the inevitable motion to dismiss. We've got to get past that in order to get to discovery. Cross your fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thats their bidness. Why speculate? Might it not taint it? n/t



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I not asking for specifics.... just an opinion of what YOU think.
Some will say more, some will say less. Ultimately how could it matter one way or the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. nothing will happen
we are stuck with bush for god only knows how many years and there will be no meaningful reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impeachthescoundrel Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I wouldn't give him the satisfaction
of even letting a thought like that run through my mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. who died and made you guys God
to rule the law of the land? :shrug: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mousie Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Holding out hope for KERRY
I'm still holding out hope for fraud to be exposed in time, but.. I know we may be stuck with bush. It may take time to totally uncover the fraud involved. Although we know it's obvious there was fraud, proving it is tricky, especially with all those repub connections fighting us every step of the way. However, Bush will not be considered a legitimate President by many and I don't think he'll be able to do as much (damage) without support, hopefully. As far as changing future elections, I DO believe that's going to happen, and by 2008 we won't be using those funny repub-owned machines and we'll have verifiable votes, and a fair election will be upheld in 2008. We've got a lot of work to do, but I think this is going to change our election process, and it's about time! After have GWB steal two elections, we can't let this go... and the Green Party and Kerry and numerous citizens' groups are going to be fighting on this, so let's stick with them in this fight! It's our democracy at stake!

May Kerry take his rightful place in the Whitehouse... if not this time around, I'd love to see it in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. I wouldn't be to sure Kerry knows more than we do...
Long before the election, people noticed that Kerry wasn't up to speed on the electronic vote fraud issue. Dean and Kucinich were much more aware what a crucial issue this could be. Of course, nobody can be up to speed on EVERYTHING in this rapidly changing and deeply treacherous world!

So Kerry has been playing catch-up in the last few weeks, and maybe he's past us on a few points where he has access to some information sources we don't. Nevertheless, there's already plenty out there on the web for everybody. Enough to prove our case, and far more than one human being could read in a few weeks, even if that was their full time job!:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. He doesn't need to know everything or even to try and understand it all
He merely has to hire experts in different fields to investigate it. For example, prosecutors aren't CPAs, yet they are the ones who put embezzlers on trial for their crimes. The expert accountants are the ones who uncovered the evidence for the charges to be brought. It's the same here. Find the best people to do the best work and let them have at it. Coordination is what is needed most, not total knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd never heard about that Texas Trouble Gang,
or whatever they called themselves, until the first suit came out, nor had I heard of the Hocking County woman's affadavit. They're definitely getting evidence we haven't a clue about.

If someone wants to be a supersleuth, you could watch the video from the first Columbus hearing. At some point, Cliff Arnebeck came forward with a sheaf of papers saying that this was proof positive that the election had been stolen (or some equally strongly-worded phrase). I don't know if it was an orchestrated moment for drama's sake, but I remember being quite taken aback, and the committee seemed to be, as well.

I wish I could remember what he said that sheaf of papers was; the only thing I recall was that my impression was that it was insider information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Rhonda J. Frazier affidavit, if it's real, certainly sounds explosive.

has anyone heard anything about it since the Freepress article?

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2004/996

Interestingly, she's listed as one of the voters in Arnebeck's suit.


If there's something there, they're keep it very under wraps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I agree with you all, I believe they have info that has not been made
public yet, that is why Kerry is following coming into the open, he knows there is proof concerning the fraud and they are only gathering as many cases and evidence of it as possible. All the more to shoot them down with while they keep attempting to cover up the stolen election and the hows of it. These are men of the law and those laws are about to set us free of the dictator Bush wishes to be, I am praying there is enough to blow it all apart and soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corbett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. They Know They Need Multiple Calibers Of Smoking Gun
While they aren't sitting on any evidence which wasn't there for the taking by others, there's no doubt in my mind that they have 2 or 3 extra holsters at the ready for use on or immediately after January 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Never tell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC