Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Moss and Arnebeck shoot themself in the foot?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:56 PM
Original message
Why did Moss and Arnebeck shoot themself in the foot?
And go after Ohio Chief Justice Moyer at the same time as going after Bush? Since the Ohio Supreme Court had to decide the case, that knocked their chance of success back to near zero WHATEVER evidence they may have had.

Their case would appear much less frivolous, had Kerry joined it, but why would he join a case that made such an outrageous error as going after the Judge from the get-go?

Obviously, we didn't have time to get this complex fraud and disenfranchizement case together properly before the electoral collage. But going off half-cocked like Arnebeck did only lowers our credibility. Now it's hard legal news that our shit don't fly.

We need to after Ohio Secretary of State Blackwell and perhaps some corruptable voting equipment firms for violations of numerous election laws, and take the time to do it right so we have real chance of getting some convictions. Ultimately, we should go after Karl Rove too...but understand THAT WILL TAKE YEARS, like Watergate, and ultimately only be able to succeed if Democrats get a hold Congress in 2006. That, in turn, will only happen if we continue to achieve reform at the state level, in state after state, to get this fraudulent voting technology removed and replaced. There's already been progress in states including California and New Jersey, we just need to keep on going.

There's definately a voting rights movement going on on the ground in Ohio and some other states now, with new information about the systems of fraud and disenfrachizement turning up all the time. It's a pity that the legal end of our efforts had to get off to such an embarassingly half-baked start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mordarlar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Honestly, i would think it draws more attention to his actions...
if he had not been named in the suit and he threw it out i would have not payed as close attention as i did. Seems to name him gives him cause to watch himself very closely. Just my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's plausible.
Moyer is corrupt. Arnebeck simply focused attention on him, for one thing.

I guess Arnebeck has finally hit the "claim to fame jackpot" on DU, considering all the threads which denigrate him. It's a shame. How I wish the Repubs had questioned Buckhead from Free Republic. He was an absolute a$$hole, but they all rallied around him, and sure enough, he got the job done of taking down Rather and saving their Lord Jeebers Bush. You've got to hand it to the Repubs, they wait for the verdict is in before they start accusing those within their ranks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. They refiled the case without Moyer; but its clear Moyer should have recus
recused himself; I think he violated legal ethics and may be in trouble himself, if we had a legal system

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. it wasn't a mistake
there were some very good threads about a week ago about this. Here's one http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=169811&mesg_id=169811

...too much is at stake for any of thes people to go around half-cocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m.standridge Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's good if it buys time to get some NUMBERS
coming in from Ohio--you know, what the news media calls "significant" numbers.
Enough in the way of numbers to turn the vote outcome in Ohio around, with more votes going to John Kerry than to George Bush.
What actual potential does that legal action have, to do that by January 6, 2005?
If it can do that, more power to it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope Moyer gets it in the end, and that justice and Arenback are on the
right track for all of us to continue the faith.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC