Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voter suppression and official malfeasance in S. Florida counties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:19 AM
Original message
Voter suppression and official malfeasance in S. Florida counties
Widespread voter suppression and malfeasance in Palm Beach, Broward, and Dade counties; and lesser degree in other touchscreen counties

http://flcv.com/palmbeao.html
http://flcv.com/browardo.html
http://flcv.com/dadeo.html
http://flcv.com/tsother.html
www.voteprotect.org Florida
www.votersunite.org Florida

(these come from limited search for machine problems only)
(small fraction of total EIRS reports for these counties which were in the thousands)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Vote machine fraud in big Florida touchscreen counties documented
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. What does it take to prove the election was stolen?
What does it take to prove the machines were set to default to Bush? To prove they were hackable? To prove voters were suppressed? To prove that democratic registration cards were thrown away? That Ken Blackwell was in a duel role as Ohio SOS and Bush/Cheney Party chair? That they stole the 2000 election? That some of the machines have no f-ing paper trail? That the companies who count most of our votes are owned by right-wing brothers, one of whom pledged to help deliver Ohio's electoral votes to Bush? To prove the exit polls were as accurate as they've been in the past? To prove that all these things didn't favor Bush by chance? To prove that democracy is at stake? What does it take?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perhaps millions of us taking to the streets? I wish I knew the answer...
I'm with you and my heart is filled with the same rage that you feel and have expressed here. 1 in 20 Americans believe it was rigged- that's a pretty big number considering there's been so little MSM coverage. I wish I knew what we could do- and do it fast, before we have to endure 4 more years of this nightmare administration who are clearly determined to undermine all that America stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Two separate issues there
That's the problem. People keep throwing everything into one big pot and wondering why the rest of the country just sees mush.

A. Things that actually happened

What does it take to prove the machines were set to default to Bush? To prove voters were suppressed?
To prove that democratic registration cards were thrown away?

To which I can add, machine tabulation errors, broken machines, etc.

B. Speculative things, with no proof of wrongdoing connected to them

To prove they were hackable?
That some of the machines have no f-ing paper trail?
That the companies who count most of our votes are owned by right-wing brothers, one of whom pledged to help deliver Ohio's electoral votes to Bush?
To prove the exit polls were as accurate as they've been in the past?
That Ken Blackwell was in a duel role as Ohio SOS and Bush/Cheney Party chair?
That they stole the 2000 election?

As long as people focus on things that have no evidence of fraud connected with them, we'll never be able to get the country to focus on what can be proven. The machines are hackable? Yep, but there's no proof they actually were. There is proof of numerous mysterious malfunctions though. I just don't understand why the focus doesn't stay on the known instead of the speculative unknown. It's how we lose every time. It's how F9/11 was discredited. I just don't know what it will take for folks to learn the difference between fact and suspicion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You make a good point,
and I have little to say for myself except it was an early morning desperation rant. I think the point I was trying to make is that we do have documentation of numerous things that are attributable to fraud, as well as all the speculative things that I listed. Cumulatively the information we have seems to point to fraud. But it seems like no matter what we have on the table, its not going to be enough to convince people there was fraud. Again this was an early morning rant and I appreciate that you responded.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The fraud is obvious here; similar to Ohio & New Mexico where
they have affidavits, etc. But Florida had more documentation of touchscreen fraud than Ohio. The difference is there it was followed up on and affidavits obtained. They could be easily in Florida. The problem is documented to the precinct and machine level by the EIRS data. Its not speculative at all. It was confirmed by poll workers, who were getting requests for help all day from votes experiencing the problems. Whats strange to me is that when everyone knows that widespread fraud occurred, no one bothers to follow up. Seems the system is so corrupt they just expect and tolerate widespread fraud.
I don't see the point in having "elections" under these circumstances.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. "throwing everything into one pot & the rest of the country sees only mush
This is true. We have been absorbing so much data, piece by piece, over the last 8 weeks, that it is overwhelming even to us (at least to me). But the "masses" have hardly heard any of what we know. When a member of the mass says something to me like "But if Kerry thought he had won, he wouldn't have conceded", I find it difficult to know where to begin to clue them in, and which particular pieces of evidence to present to them. I need to create a list of the most powerful examples of fraud, disenfranchisement, and illegalities that we know of. And it has to be worded simply and concisely so that they can absorb it all quickly before their eyes glaze over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC