Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Holiday for Vote Thieves - great article here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:30 AM
Original message
No Holiday for Vote Thieves - great article here
No holiday for vote thieves
by Glen Ford and Peter Gamble, publishers of BlackCommentator.com

The dean of the Congressional Black Caucus is confident that at least a few U.S. senators will join House members on Jan. 6 to question the fairness of the Nov. 2 election. John Conyers Jr., the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, told Salon.com he doesn’t believe the Senate will repeat its performance of four years ago, when Black lawmakers sought in vain for one senatorial objection to “official misconduct, deliberate fraud and an attempt to suppress voter turnout by unlawful means” in Florida, as Congressman Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., put it at the time.

“No, I think the Senate is going to go along with an inquiry this time,” said Conyers. “I don't think they would embarrass themselves to let this happen two times in a row … I just don't think the Senate would get caught in that position.” Conyers is careful not to name names, claiming he hasn’t spoken directly to a single senator, but adding, “There are Republicans who support what I'm doing who haven't been willing to come forward.”

http://www.sfbayview.com/122904/votethieves122904.shtml

San Francisco Bay View
National Black Newspaper
4917 Third Street
San Francisco California 94124
Phone: (415) 671-0789
Fax: (415) 671-0316
Email:editor@sfbayview.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. He hasn't spoken directly to a single senator?
Eeek. That doesn't make me feel too good.

I have faith in him and what he believes but that sentence almost made my heart stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Read again, with a lawyers eye -
"Conyers is careful not to name names, claiming he hasn’t spoken directly to a single senator"

Hasn't spoken directly to......

Wide open for interpretation.

Emails
Phone calls to staffers
Letters
Voicemail

Whatever.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ah! Okay, I'll freely admit that I am not a lawyer! :)
I read it with all of the panic and hope and fear and hope and anger that I've been feeling.

Thanks for calming me down by pointing out the obvious. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Me neither, just an Aquarian
Evidently they tend to analyze all things to death.:freak:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabid_nerd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. or he has spoken directly to
multiple senators, lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. good one!
I missed that one!

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpanzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Maybe he's only spoken to married senators!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. lol (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsConduct Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great article, thanks. Now we just have to hope that Conyers isn't
just wishful thinking like the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you cyberpj for reposting this
I first posted this in this forum on Dec 25 and nobody read it. I hope they do this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. sorry - a quick search on article title didn't give me anything -
I thought it was dated 12/29 -- perhaps it's just showing up on the 12/29 home page.

Oh well - try, try again.......

xox

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Don't be sorry, au contraire
Edited on Thu Dec-30-04 10:49 AM by downstairsparts
Everybody should be grateful to you for bringing back this excellent analysis. It's a long read though. I guess people were so busy with Christmas to take the time to read it carefully.

Thanks again for posting it. I'll try to help keep it kicked. Hope lots of people read and comment.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I especially like this part -

Thousands of perps

The “dozens of problems” of which Rep. Conyers speaks are actually hundreds of specific criminal offenses involving perhaps thousands of persons acting with large or small groups of others in Ohio and Florida alone. Investigators should view the legions of co-conspirators in Republican election crimes – some casual or even unwilling, others purely mercenary and politically unreliable – as assets, potential witnesses in a constellation of criminal conspiracies, any one of which might lead to the Mother Lode: the Bush inner circle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes and how the article very clearly takes on "conspiracies"
that even though "they occur every time a group of persons plans to commit criminal acts," the media twists the sense of the word to mean nutcase theories and in doing so discredits investigations into what actually is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. National Voter Registration Act
973gg-10. Criminal Penalties

A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office, knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for -

registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;

urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or

exercising any right under this subchapter; or

knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by -

the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or

the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held, shall be fined in accordance with Title 18 … or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The election law statues are ignored by the judges
Then appeals, then up the legal chain, getting jerked each time. With a rep judicial system, it's impossible, unless some have a conscious, which has been purged long ago, how the judges got appointed in the first place. Look at the bus* nominees for appeals court and you see he likes judges without any conscious.So much for morals, values, all code words for forget about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Told everyone they have ALL THE MACHINERY
RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Posting another quote
:kick:To kick this

"Given the hostile backdrop, post-Nov. 2 protesters, investigators, litigators, agitators and fundraisers are nothing less than heroic. Although he would disagree with the notion, Rep. Conyers is acting as “our” Special Prosecutor, methodically laying the factual groundwork for future legal and political action while at the same time giving the “troops” a central focus around which to orbit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Heroics doesn't cause justice in a skewed system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. We should refere to Congressman Conyers as the "Independent Special
Prosecutor" and let the pukes get all worked up about it. good fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC