Where's news on the Kerry motion at U.S. District Court in Ohio??

[New Earth]

It's Thursday and Kerry's motion was filed on Monday. How long does it usually take to get a response from a court on something like this?

[Goldeneye]

1. There were supposed to be more subpeonas today and tommorow

as well. I haven't heard anything about the Kerry motion yet. Certainly not much going on.

[righteous1]

2. "Read the law first" said that they had denied it, but I have

seen no confirmation of that (expidited discovery etc)

[New Earth]

3. no, that was the Ohio Supreme Court

who denied the Arnebeck request to get the machines.

[righteous1]

4. Yes he started a thread on that but someone asked him on that

thread about the federal case and he stated that the motion in fed court had also been denied but on different grounds than the SC action. Again, no confirmation

[New Earth]

7. i highly doubt this court is going to deny the motion.

[Firespirit]

8. I'd be surprised...

Judge Sargus overruled the Delaware Co. TRO. He and Judge Kemp were both Clinton appointees, I believe.

I understood that the motion as filed by the Greens was denied on grounds of "inability to demonstrate a chance of success on the merits" or some such.... again no confirmation.... and that was why K/E refiled it. If it has been denied for them too, I'd like to know why.

I'm also amazed that there hasn't been a huge thread and meltdown over it, if this has happened.

:kick:

[Firespirit]

5. Kicking for answers...

Couldn't find it, if this is the thread (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=207901#210248), but I didn't read the whole thing, just did a search on the page.

Where it was filed -- http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/

Anyone with PACER?

Will Pitt? I think you were first aware that it would be filed.

I'd like to know about this too.

[FogerRox]

6. Kickin for Faye

[Melissa G]

9. Kickin' for an answer n/t

[corbett]

10. Kicking For Answers

No matter how partisan the court, there are some motions which cannot be denied capriciously.

[Firespirit]

11. One more time.

Anyone at all?

[Terre]

12. Here is the Case Number

and I hope it's correct, though I'm not 100% sure. I got it from a post on dKos. Maybe Will can correct me if I'm wrong.

Case # C-2-04-1139

Enter the above Case # here:
http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/opinions.htm

I just did, and no results yet have been posted to the site.